A more apt combination is New York and New Jersey, since nearly all the NJ deaths are in the northern region surrounding ... you guessed it ... new york city. If you do that, you get 19,624 deaths out of a total of 34,475. In other words, 57% of all deaths in the USA from this are in the NYC metro area.
A more apt combination is New York and New Jersey, since nearly all the NJ deaths are in the northern region surrounding ... you guessed it ... new york city. If you do that, you get 19,624 deaths out of a total of 34,475. In other words, 57% of all deaths in the USA from this are in the NYC metro area.
Throw in Louisiana and LA California for even more distortion re response to actual serious disease.
Thanks
A more apt combination is New York and New Jersey, since nearly all the NJ deaths are in the northern region surrounding ... you guessed it ... new york city. If you do that, you get 19,624 deaths out of a total of 34,475. In other words, 57% of all deaths in the USA from this are in the NYC metro area.
—
Yes. Add CT because it is also in that tri-state area.
Really there are:
NY, NJ, CT
MI
LA
MA
That account for a huge percentage.
And it is not statewide but localized to dense urban regions.
We need to make more stringent rules for them and let other places open.