Replies

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2020/04/16/its-going-to-be-biblical-a-deepdive-into-the-bloodlines-with-qanon-neonrevolt-greatawakening/

“...So now I’m going to go where Heiser doesn’t, and propose that these ancient Pagan religions you see around the world, from Egypt, to Babylon, and beyond – these are all systems of literal Demonic worship, and that the “bloodlines” we hear so much about are actually Nephilim bloodlines; that they pledge allegiance to perpetuating these systems. They bear specific genetic markets (as alluded to by Q with the 23andMe posts), and engage in certain Satanic practices in order to “strengthen” their bloodlines (because normally, these bloodlines would become more and more diluted over time and interbreeding with humans). This is why, I think, the moonchild ritual is particularly important. Recall that in a moonchild ritual, they are trying to become possessed before/during sex. And recall that possession, given what is said in Enoch, is really allowing the spirit of a dead Nephilim to take over your body. Seeing that the Watchers are all imprisoned, there’s no way to make “new” Nephilim, so this strikes me as the next “best” thing for this Cabal.
...”

New Neonrevolt:

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2020/04/16/its-going-to-be-biblical-a-deepdive-into-the-bloodlines-with-qanon-neonrevolt-greatawakening/

Nephilim World Order?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I’ve read on the “secret” NWO organization in the US and one of the reports was from a woman who was a sex slave in LA and moved around with the elites (I think she was underage then). She reported that some of the elites will brag to people like her, and that they genuinely beleive themselves to be direct descendents of the Nephilim “gods” and plan to restore their dominance. I’ve read other assertions that the NWO bloodlines believe this, and they believe they know to which exact bloodline of which ruler to whom they are related. This is part of their “breeding program”. Given the hybrid theory, it might explain why their breeding program involves birth defects, among other things. They think are re-assembling the master race in their actions.

I believe The Book of Enoch was mentioned by an old Q drop which they quickly pulled back, remarking they had pushed too deep. At the time I got a “visit” from someone testing how I would react to that. I had always been taught that The Book of Enoch was heretical, vile etc. I know it is not the inspired word of God, but the online comments about it at the time mainly said it wasn’t valid because it wasn’t the inspired word of God.

I wasn’t about to advocate we trust that content in a way we trust Q content to help us navigate what we were watching in real life, even knowing Q contains some disinfo. In fact, I was concerned about the traditional reports that it was toxic, meant to mislead people from God. I gave my visitor a link to a generic Got Questions website re Enoch and that source said it’s not inspired and wouldn’t be considered valid. I later wished I had been better prepared - because if there was some way in which it pointed to partial information we needed in order to understand The Great Awakening, then I failed to make the jump. Apparently I was not alone in this regard. Q withdrew the drops noting they had pushed too far. A friend noted later, had we tried to take on information many of us didn’t believe or considered spiritually toxic, the Q movement would have faltered at that time. Welp, we’ll never know.

But the degree to which the pedovore/cannibalism etc. “traditions” exemplify ancient evil in the bible, and the need to fight this evil with God’s strength, not our own, I went back last year to learn more so that if it came around again,I would be ready.

I watched some videos on Youtube and many seemed to be just what I feared (cray cray). But I kept looking and buried in the mess were gems - videos by Michael S. Heiser. I believed his videos were properly respectful to God, didn’t try to claim Enoch was inspired by God, helped explain how contemporary apocrypha can be used to get context, and why there are quotes from Enoch in the bible. After a few Heiser videos, I purchased one of his books.

Reversing Hermon: Enoch, the Watchers, and the Forgotten Mission of Jesus Christ Kindle Edition
by Michael S. Heiser (Author)
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07N6MD2ZN/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_d_asin_title_o03?ie=UTF8&psc=1

I read the book and loved it! Some portions of the inspirect bible which I had considered separate and distinct began to merge without any reinterpretation of the verses. I read other authors who seem to converge on the same points, and watch Chuck Missler videos in which his scholarship agrees with Heiser’s underlying scholarship. There’s core info (decodes) all agree on, and then quibbles as to how to proceed in analysis from those points.

I had been following another person on Youtube for different spiritual content. He’s a messianic jew and scholar whose translations of ancient Hebrew I found worthy watching. Like a ship changing course gradually, his scholarship steadily tacked until his basic work came into agreement with Chuck Missler, Heiser and others, and now with Neon Revolt.

We all have to decide for ourselves. Prayers up for powerful discernment that we do not, despite our good intentions, lead each other astray. We may need to form some threads in the religion forum for extended discussions of that particular religious as debates here could rip the thread apart. Don’t have to put Q in those religion threads, and we don’t have to rip up our Q thread for understanding.

My impression now is, like all things, the NWO buried information and shamed anyone who wanted to even look at it as evil. The Book of Enoch is actually several books by different authors smashed together so it’s easy to sample the content and come away with a bizarre sliver.

The Michael Heiser content I viewed was current last summer - if he has changed his theology, I wouldn’t know it. When I checked just now, I see he’s quite active with recent content that I’ve never seen. I just tried to find the video interview that got me interested in his work (sit down casual interview with a kindly nerd) but don’t see it available. For those wanting to check out Neon Revolt’s book recommendation, Heiser has video interviews on his book on Youtube.

Nephilim World Order?

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2020/04/16/its-going-to-be-biblical-a-deepdive-into-the-bloodlines-with-qanon-neonrevolt-greatawakening/

I appreciate the effort, and while I believe Neon Revolt is certainly sincere, this theory is so full of holes it could not float. If his assertions were true, they would destroy the Christian, as well as the philosophical understanding of God.

He has God speaking to other Elohim as if to other beings of equal stature or of the same essence to be more precise. He may not know that the primary statement of the Jewish religion was the shema. "Hear O Israel, the Lord God He is One. You shall Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and strength. And these words that I command you today shall be in your heart. And you shall teach them diligently to your children, and you shall speak of them when you sit at home, and when you walk along the way, and when you lie down and when you rise up. And you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be for frontlets between your eyes. And you shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates." HE IS ONE..The great monotheistic statement.

You cannot introduce other beings, equal to God, called Elohim without destroying the Jewish understanding of God. Keep in mind that Judaism and the Jewish God is also the underpinning of the Christian faith.

Philosophically speaking it is important to note that there can be only one being which we understand to be the first cause of all things. This being would have existence as an attribute. That means that it exists necessarily. Anything that does not exist necessarily exists contingently, which simply means that it could either not exist (Me for example) or it could exist and be different than it is.

The question is "Why is there something instead of nothing?" philosophers have noted that, "If there ever was a time when nothing existed then nothing would exist now." Or to quote Stevie Wonder "Nothing from nothing leaves nothing, but you gotta have something if you're gonna be (exist) with me"

Anything which begins to exist is contingent, simply means that it could either not exist or exist and be different than it is. The universe began to exist a finite time ago. See Eistein, Hawking, or any other cosmologist with a PhD and they will affirm this to be true. Every contingent thing needs a cause. Therefore, the universe must have a cause.

The most important thing, though, is that there must be one thing that is uncaused which is the sufficient cause for all contingent things. Aristotle called it the unmoved mover. Aquinas referred to it as an efficient cause. Whatever the case there can be only one uncaused being.

Satan cannot qualify because he is not transcendent. (lacks the omni qualities; omnipotence, omnipresence, and omniscience) Nor can any other created being. BTW the bible records that all beings are created with the exception of God. This is why in the beginning of John's gospel he goes into such detail about how Christ was “from the beginning” uncreated. This separates Him from the angels. (p.s. While the name aggelos (Strong’s Greek no. 32) does mean "sent one" that is insufficient grounds upon which to create an entire category of beings equal to God who are merely fulfilling a role as sent ones).

Also, in his example from Job where he refers to Satan (which does mean adversary) as merely fulfilling a role. He leaves out that God is able to limit Satan and that Satan must receive permission for his actions. This hardly seems to indicate an equal being. Also don’t forget that Satan rebelled against God, tried to usurp His rightful place, and was cast out .Additionally, the apostle Paul notes in phillippians 2:6 that Jesus was found in the "form" of God. Jesus voluntarily placed Himself under the will of God not of necessity. “He emptied Himself and became obedient”.

Sorry this became so long, but Neon is badly mistaken in his understanding of God.

Now! All of that aside it in no way means that these families aren’t part of the Nephilim (demigods of old or as Genisis calls them men of renown) Either they imagine themselves to be Nephilim or there is something much more sinister going on.

I’m absolutely sure he doesn’t know the implications theologically of what he is putting out, but they are grim. Christians can’t accept this unless they are prepared to offer some altered form of Christianity. And, many Gods are not needed to make the argument about the Nephilim.