Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner
"Crackpot non-science unworthy of this board. Sorry to have to speak truth so bluntly. "

Thank you it drives me up the wall.

I work as an RF Engineer tech in the past and still play with radio as a hobby now. I use to do RF Radiation Surveys on HF, VHF and UHF transmitter sites to flag off dangerous areas.

5G operates around 24.25 Ghz. A safe distance for this is 2.52984 Millimeters

The higher the Frequency shorter the distance. A person would have to climb a Cell Tower and hug the antenna to get radiated.

I advise not licking the Antenna you might get Coronavirus.

FCC Maximum Permissible RF Exposure Regulations
100 posted on 04/07/2020 11:13:56 AM PDT by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: DEPcom

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355#bib11

The links on this page, appear at first blush to be from reputable, peer-review journals.

e.g. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000527361500053X?via%3Dihub

Investigation of the effects of distance from sources on apoptosis, oxidative stress and cytosolic calcium accumulation via TRPV1 channels induced by mobile phones and Wi-Fi in breast cancer cells

is from Elsevier.

It considered oxidative stress on certain breast cancer cell cultures as a function of distance and frequency of several WiFi signals.

It did look at distance — not from a tower, but from a cell phone, and found that the control group had no statistically significant difference from 20 cm and 25 cm separation.

Have read into detail to suss out in vivo vs in vitro, study design, or sample size.

Or of course, regular tissue compared to breast cancer cells.


110 posted on 04/07/2020 11:27:15 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


111 posted on 04/07/2020 11:29:30 AM PDT by SlipperySlope99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DEPcom

Yes, I dealt with this when on a county planning commission. People were protesting a phone tower placement on top of a mountain so steep you couldn’t walk up it. And the signal path went way above all housing in the area.

We ignored them and approved the tower.


114 posted on 04/07/2020 11:37:30 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Epstein pulled a Carradine, the bozo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DEPcom; Mariner
I work as an RF Engineer tech in the past and still play with radio as a hobby now.

I had a good friend who worked around a lot of RF emitting equipment in larger DOD server and communications equipment rooms. He died in his 40s of Lou Gehrig's disease.

I had a cousin who allowed a microwave tower to be installed on his property, about 300 yrds from his home. He died of a similar disease.

I'm not sayin' that's what killed them. But, my home router has one 2.4G channel and 2 each 5G channels. I only turn on the 2.4G radio. If microwave level freq. was entirely safe, then screens shielding microwave door windows, nor copper gaskets sealing microwave tubes would not be necessary.

Just sayin'...

118 posted on 04/07/2020 11:40:37 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DEPcom

From a distance of 1 foot, it penetrates the skin for about 1mm.

From 10 ft it does not penetrate at all.

Just like it has such a hard time penetrating windows/walls/fog and rain.


141 posted on 04/07/2020 12:05:22 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DEPcom

“The higher the Frequency shorter the distance. A person would have to climb a Cell Tower and hug the antenna to get radiated.”

yep, what you said.


149 posted on 04/07/2020 12:16:28 PM PDT by CJ Wolf ( #wwg1wga #gin&tonic #godwins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DEPcom

Reminds me of the sixties when the hippies were raving about nuclear radiation from atmospheric testing. In that case, they were probably right, though. The government was trying to compare it with the supposedly huge amounts that we get from the sun. I remember a college professor of mine saying to get that much radiation from the sun you’d have to sunbathe for hours with a plutonium rod up your ___ .


257 posted on 04/07/2020 2:33:39 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: DEPcom
I advise not licking the Antenna you might get Coronavirus.

That could be a shocking experience!

662 posted on 04/08/2020 12:14:31 PM PDT by Fresh Wind ("We're not going to make America great again. It was never that great." Andrew Cuomo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson