Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What models is FAUCI using?
3/30/20 | me

Posted on 03/30/2020 11:33:24 AM PDT by spacejunkie2001

This morning, Trump was on Fox & Friends and Steve Ducey asked him (in essence) 'Mr. President, what did you see that changed your mind from opening the country back up on 4/12 to now being 4/30?' And Trump responded 'I didn't see anything, I'm going on what Fauci and Birx are telling me'. My question is, what are Birx and Fauci using to cause our nation to be shutdown and ALL industries come to a screeching halt? We already know they WERE using the faulty Imperial College model. Are they still using it? Did they switch to something else? If so, what is that something else?

Needless to say, I am very concerned that the information they're peddling to Trump and the rest of us, is incorrect, either benevolently or malevolently. We need to be made privvy to where that information is coming from


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: corona; coronavanity; fake; fauci; shutdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: spacejunkie2001
This one won't make your eyes glaze over ... much ...

COVID-19 predicted to infect 81% of U.S. population, cause 2.2 million deaths in U.S. - Mar 18th, 2020

We assumed an incubation period of 5.1 days. Infectiousness is assumed to occur from 12 hours prior to the onset of symptoms for those that are symptomatic and from 4.6 days after infection in those that are asymptomatic with an infectiousness profile over time that results in a 6.5-day mean generation time. We assume that symptomatic individuals are 50% more infectious than asymptomatic individuals. On recovery from infection, individuals are assumed to be immune to re-infection in the short term. Evidence from the Flu Watch cohort study suggests that re-infection with the same strain of seasonal circulating coronavirus is highly unlikely in the same or following season.

Infection was assumed to be seeded in each country at an exponentially growing rate (with a doubling time of 5 days) from early January 2020, with the rate of seeding being calibrated to give local epidemics which reproduced the observed cumulative number of deaths in G.B. or the U.S. seen by March 14, 2020.

Analyses of data from China as well as data from those returning on repatriation flights suggest that 40-50% of infections were not identified as cases. This may include asymptomatic infections, mild disease and a level of under-ascertainment. We therefore assume that two-thirds of cases are sufficiently symptomatic to self-isolate (if required by policy) within 1 day of symptom onset, and a mean delay from onset of symptoms to hospitalization of 5 days. We assume that 30% of those that are hospitalized will require critical care (invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO) based on early reports from COVID-19 cases in the U.K., China and Italy. Based on expert clinical opinion, we assume that 50% of those in critical care will die and an age-dependent proportion of those that do not require critical care die (calculated to match the overall IFR). We calculate bed demand numbers assuming a total duration of stay in hospital of 8 days if critical care is not required and 16 days (with 10 days in ICU) if critical care is required. With 30% of hospitalized cases requiring critical care, we obtain an overall mean duration of hospitalization of 10.4 days, slightly shorter than the duration from hospital admission to discharge observed for COVID-19 cases internationally (who will have remained in hospital longer to ensure negative tests at discharge) but in line with estimates for general pneumonia admissions.

In the (unlikely) absence of any control measures or spontaneous changes in individual behavior, we would expect a peak in mortality (daily deaths) to occur after approximately 3 months. In such scenarios, given an estimated R0 of 2.4, we predict 81% of the G.B. and U.S. populations would be infected over the course of the epidemic. Epidemic timings are approximate given the limitations of surveillance data in both countries: The epidemic is predicted to be broader in the U.S. than in G.B. and to peak slightly later. This is due to the larger geographic scale of the U.S., resulting in more distinct localized epidemics across states than seen across G.B. The higher peak in mortality in G.B. is due to the smaller size of the country and its older population compared with the U.S. In total, in an unmitigated epidemic, we would predict approximately 510,000 deaths in G.B. and 2.2 million in the U.S., not accounting for the potential negative effects of health systems being overwhelmed on mortality.

Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf

R0 is how many people one infected person passes it on to.

80% of US infected is 280,000,000. 2.2 million dead is would be less than 1% of that.

I just noticed this too, that the death estimate is as if the hospitals have enough capacity to handle everybody who shows up! "not accounting for the potential negative effects of health systems being overwhelmed on mortality."

61 posted on 03/30/2020 1:12:23 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I hope POTUS got to hear, or hear about, the things Rush said today about models. It would give him some guidance as to how far he should let Fauci and Birx lead him.


62 posted on 03/30/2020 1:19:55 PM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I think if Rush were to drop a dime Trump would pick-up the phone.


63 posted on 03/30/2020 1:24:28 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Substantial huge increase in deaths in July, says the fellow at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J0d59dd-qM around 30:30 - 30:50

Best case scenrio he says, at 31:29

Title of the piece is “Why we can’t save you.” Okay then.


64 posted on 03/30/2020 1:28:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 ...... see how that works?


65 posted on 03/30/2020 1:30:09 PM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Okay, I guess he’s wrong then.

Time for a block party?


66 posted on 03/30/2020 1:30:27 PM PDT by chris37 (Coronavirus wasn't born in a bowl of bat soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

how many are they projected to be infected in the US by 4/15 or 8/15? either one....


67 posted on 03/30/2020 1:46:30 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Fauci had two epidemics: 2009 and 2014 to make the necessary changes to avoid this happening...He failed.

Partner, Anthony Fauci has not even produced for us to see is either a histogram showing the folks that have died say from 60 years of age to 100 yrs of age at 10 yr. intervals.

He has not produced anything so that America can see how many deaths are occurring and at what ages they died.

The CDC and NIH is useless.

68 posted on 03/30/2020 1:50:23 PM PDT by TheConservativeTejano (God Bless Texas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

cboldt...what’s the projected infections (not deaths) over the next 6 months or so?


69 posted on 03/30/2020 1:58:03 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001
-- what's the projected infections (not deaths) over the next 6 months or so? --

Good question. The only source of data in the model, for that, is "number of beds," which will be fewer, maybe by much, that the number of infections.

My eyeball says an average of about 100,000 per day, March to June 16. Bear with me on the math.

If we figured each bed/day is a unique infection (person), we'd get 100,000 per day times 90 days, which would be 9 million (beds times days). But we know each patient takes more than one day. Having read about how long people stay is, and recalling numbers like 8 days, I'll use 9 days and come up with 1,000,000 people infected bad enough to require a hospital bed.

The same graph has an ICU bed requirement. That looks to me to be about 20,000 additional per day. Use that as a fudge factor.

Hospital resource use - IHME

70 posted on 03/30/2020 2:16:59 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: chris37
-- I guess he's wrong then. --

We don't know if he's wrong or not. I was just remarking on his predictions. Time will test those.

71 posted on 03/30/2020 2:18:20 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

That is definitely true.

Time will tell, and it will not be long.


72 posted on 03/30/2020 2:20:16 PM PDT by chris37 (Coronavirus wasn't born in a bowl of bat soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I found this, dated today

COVID-19: U.S. at a Glance*†
Total cases: 140,904
Total deaths: 2,405
Jurisdictions reporting cases: 55 (50 states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, Northern Marianas, and US Virgin Islands)


73 posted on 03/30/2020 2:23:29 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

Not a direct number, but one has to extrapolate. Based on their projections, anywhere from 500,000 to 5 million infected by April 15.


74 posted on 03/30/2020 2:27:59 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeTejano
-- Partner, Anthony Fauci has not even produced for us to see is either a histogram showing the folks that have died say from 60 years of age to 100 yrs of age at 10 yr. intervals. --

Figure 3 in IHME Projection Report has "Hospitalizations per death" broken down by age. Figure 1 is probability of death based on age. 0-54 year old is one group, then decade intervals.

75 posted on 03/30/2020 2:28:03 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeTejano
-- Partner, Anthony Fauci has not even produced for us to see is either a histogram showing the folks that have died say from 60 years of age to 100 yrs of age at 10 yr. intervals. --

https://virusncov.com/covid-19-age-sex-cases-and-deaths <- risk of dying by age

I think that is really dated information though, and skewed by reporting quirks, geographic location vs. quality of care, and other variables.

That olders are "at risk" and youngers are not, isn't a contentious proposition, I don't think. It's been the basis of public service announcements and plenty of articles. Like father bans kid from house after kid goes to FL for spring break.

76 posted on 03/30/2020 2:40:18 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

The increase of infections was always going to increase with the increase of testing but negative tests are at 80 to 92 percent across the US vs 8 to 20 per cent positive. 20 percent get sick enough to go to hospital. It’s the packing of the hospitals with that number along with all the other...”regular sick” we already have are what the problem is.

Our perverse bean counters have designed a “just in time” health care system along with utilitarian minded Democrats who just want to wring out just so much care for so few dollars so that the savings could go to their cronies. We have no surge capabilities...so in a panic they try to bottle up a nation of 330 million people to try to save a medical system that was bound to crumble by this or some other disaster under their “process guided” blind mindedness. The medical systems and many governing localities are being run by gamblers who try to “get theirs” before the roulette stops at black “00” and the citizenry are going to have to pay hard for not taking their votes or their politics seriously.


77 posted on 03/30/2020 2:41:00 PM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

He’s using the fake HIV causes AIDS model...obviously


78 posted on 03/30/2020 2:41:45 PM PDT by northislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

we are currently at 140k. That is a HUGE jump in that short of time, whether the 500k or 5m


79 posted on 03/30/2020 2:42:37 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

It is quite natural for an exponential function like this spread. We will see where it ends up in mid-April, but I think we could see something in that range.


80 posted on 03/30/2020 3:00:39 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson