Oh and “reductio ad absurdum” is an effective tool in making people think.
I gave you a concrete example of someone who would need to be in forced quarantine were they infected and not self quarantining.
The absurd would be for him to be free if infected and not self quarantining. You lost the argument.
Ok, well I am glad you are the referee and can declare unilaterally your position to be correct. You are right — I see your brilliance, the immediate denial of liberty without due process because YOU have decided makes you win the argument. Tell me what grounds should we accept for the denial of liberty. I find that YOUR spreading of false information is against the public health, perhaps I can involuntarily detain you until I am satisfied your behavior is appropriate — sounds like a paradise. Might I suggest a flight to North Korea — I understand they have no cases and can incarcerate people anytime they want. Sounds like paradise for you.
Just in case you forgot...
1. Do you believe that this behavior in your video you have shared is prevalent?
2. What is your solution to what this person has done?
3. Can you protect yourself without deciding who should be locked up?
4. Are you more independent if you protect yourself or if you toss this guy in quarantine — which by the way — you are advocating against his will which means he is incarcerated.
Let the world know who you are. I am certain anyone reading my posts understands that I value liberty over tyranny.