Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cambridge University Press makes peer-reviewed COVID-19 articles Open Access
Cambridge University Press ^ | March 10, 2020 | Cambridge University Press

Posted on 03/10/2020 2:21:46 PM PDT by RetiredScientist

Corona Virus Free Access Collection


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: coronavirus; covid19; sarscov2; scientificarticles; wuhansarscov2
Cambridge University Press has made their peer-reviewed articles on COVID-19 Open Access. Free is good!
1 posted on 03/10/2020 2:21:46 PM PDT by RetiredScientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RetiredScientist

So tell us what it is about? Why should we follow a link without some info to let us know what we will find?

Let me guess. It’s more serious than any virus ever seen and we are all gonna DIE.

Am I right?


2 posted on 03/10/2020 2:26:13 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredScientist

So far I am not seeing much information at all, to be quite honest.


3 posted on 03/10/2020 2:36:47 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15
"It’s more serious than any virus ever seen and we are all gonna DIE.

Once you accept that, it's liberating. TEOTWAWKI and I feel fine.
4 posted on 03/10/2020 2:38:24 PM PDT by JoSixChip (I'm an American Nationalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Technical stuff like

“...Twenty-eight patients (66.6%) came from 8 family clusters. Eleven (2.7%) of 413 HCWs caring these confirmed cases were found to have unprotected exposure requiring quarantine for 14 days. None of them was infected and nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was not observed. Environmental surveillance performed in a patient with viral load of 3.3x106 copies/ml (pooled nasopharyngeal/ throat swab) and 5.9x106 copies/ml (saliva) respectively. SARS-CoV-2 revealed in 1 (7.7%) of 13 environmental samples, but not in 8 air samples collected at a distance of 10 cm from patient’s chin with or without wearing a surgical mask....”


5 posted on 03/10/2020 2:39:45 PM PDT by PeteB570 ( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Livingin-Fear-TV
6 posted on 03/10/2020 2:45:50 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: timestax

Why does peer-reviewed COVID-19 articles make you “live in fear”?


7 posted on 03/10/2020 3:03:01 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

These papers will be helpful if you want to learn more about what is known about the virus. You can read the first hand reports of the peer-reviewed resuts. These are not fear-mongers writing on a blog.

Normally all these papers are behind paywalls. I was not expecting them to be free. I have a subscription to one of these journals through a scientific society membership. These papers typically cost $25-$50 each a-la-cart.


8 posted on 03/10/2020 3:38:15 PM PDT by RetiredScientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RetiredScientist

Thanks.

Cell used to give me a complementary subscription.


9 posted on 03/10/2020 4:05:16 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson