Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: InterceptPoint

Yes, and even Wikipedia itself can be a fake news source when what’s being discussed are fast moving statistics with political implications.

We need to trust what true experts — at places like the NIH and CDC — are saying.


393 posted on 03/09/2020 12:13:49 AM PDT by poconopundit (Joe Biden has long been the Senate's court jester. He's 24/7 malarkey and more corrupt than Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: poconopundit

You are correct about Wikipedia. But if we are looking worldwide and we need to, there will be hundreds of contributors to these articles. That would be pretty hard to coordinate in favor of a U.S. based political narrative.

I look mostly at trends. In terms of new cases the trend is up and at very rapid rates in many countries including ours. They are doubling every 2-3 days. Or the Wikipedia data is bogus. Could be but I doubt it. Check out the anecdotal stories coming from the hospitals. If this becomes a runaway infection we will know it.

But I do agree that the Wiki data from China is useless.


404 posted on 03/09/2020 5:32:18 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson