Thanks for the mature, non-homi
nem counter-argument. Such well-reasoned discourse is always enlightening.
If Apple thinks they can control what I do with my phone after I bought it (assuming I’d buy one of those overpriced toys), they’re nuts. I doubt I would ever have occasion to use an Apple product in a public way to make money, but I’d be more inclined to ask for forgiveness than permission.
Obviously facts and law mean nothing to you. Are sure you are on the right forum?
"Overpriced toys"? Really? Thanks for proving my point about your ignorance on Apple products. That says more about your trolling purpose and ignorance, not to mention your opinion of your superior purchasing choices in this thread than your comments. I did get a kick out of your "ad hominem" comment but you seemed to deserve the kick due to your deliberate obtuse responses. ;^)
You are probably not aware that several Android brand flagship models, for example Samsung’s ($1,879) have been priced higher than Apple’s iPhone flagship model? Apple also offers brand new iPhones in their online store for as low as $449, or with trade-in $349? Either one of which possesses a CPU that is 50% faster than any Android phone offers, even though it’s three generations behind Apple’s latest and fastest mobile processors which are more powerful than those found in MacBook Pros with Intel i5 processors. All of Apple’s iPhones and iPads are far more secure than any Android device with hardware based 256bit AES Encryption.
They are hardly "toys" considering that at least eight full feature length movies and numerous music videos, several National Geographic photo spreads, as well as multiple National major magazine covers have been shot on iPhones, and some fully edited on iPhones and iPads. That kind of professional work is not done on "toys."