It occurs to me, this was covered in “Q” threads - “art” is Hunter’s new money laundering scheme now that the old ones are getting scrutiny.
It made me think of that weird Marina and HRC arts/embassies crap.
Q post # 734
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 540a54 No.342895
Feb 11 2018 19:30:54 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 3de3d6 No.342747
Feb 11 2018 19:19:46 (EST)
>>342714
sauce
https:// www.wsj.com/articles/experimental-drug-promises-to-kill-the-flu-virus-in-a-day-1518264004
>>342747
What a coincidence.
This board has more power & influence than anyone comprehends.
Q
Q post # 735
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 540a54 No.343019
Feb 11 2018 19:38:19 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 91a1c7 No.342919
Feb 11 2018 19:32:20 (EST)
>>342895
Q, how long will we have to wait for the cures of cancer and other sicknesses?
>>342919
Chatter amongst those in control has begun.
They know we know which means the public will know.
Release prior to cover up.
Public informed and collapse.
Which option?
Q
I just tripped over this. Un-freaking-believable.
Q fever is an infection caused by the bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Q fever is usually a mild disease with flu-like symptoms. Many people have no symptoms at all. In a small percentage of people, the infection can resurface years later. This more deadly form of Q fever can damage your heart, liver, brain and lungs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_fever
Excerpt
Q fever is a disease caused by infection with Coxiella burnetii,[1][2] a bacterium that affects humans and other animals. This organism is uncommon, but may be found in cattle, sheep, goats, and other domestic mammals, including cats and dogs. The infection results from inhalation of a spore-like small-cell variant, and from contact with the milk, urine, feces, vaginal mucus, or semen of infected animals. Rarely, the disease is tick-borne.[3] The incubation period is 9–40 days. Humans are vulnerable to Q fever, and infection can result from even a few organisms.[3] The bacterium is an obligate intracellular pathogenic parasite.
::...“art” is Hunter’s new money laundering scheme now that the old ones are getting scrutiny.::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Makes sense and explains the NYT’s investment in his story.