Thanks, interesting!
I am quoting Descartes and all the discussion around “cogito ergo sum”. Since I accept his conclusion, your suggestion about the motives or the characterization of the “God whoever he is” while novel would not be interesting. In other words, epistemology is settled, I’d rather just go straight to the science.
You however, FRiend, are extremely interesting and I would wonder how you came to the intelligence box idea as a matter of the most pleasant curiosity. I confess that I won’t take the box idea seriously, no offense FRiend, I would just assume at the outset that it is self-refuting and move on.
Thanks for commenting. Your comment was useful for an half hour of pleasant speculation, while I took a shower and dressed. Thanks and I will take note of you in future!