Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly diagnosed coronavirus patient being treated at UC Davis Medical Center
Davis Enterprise ^ | 2-26-20 | Anne Ternus-Bellamy

Posted on 02/26/2020 6:24:22 PM PST by DouglasKC

The UC Davis Medical Center is treating a patient who may be the first person in the country to have contracted the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) from community exposure.

The California Department of Public Health reported Wednesday the individual is a resident of Solano County who had no known exposure to the virus through travel or close contact with a known infected individual.

An email sent out Wednesday by two UC Davis officials said the patient arrived at the medical center in Sacramento last Wednesday but was only tested for the virus on Sunday despite a request made by med center officials that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conduct a test when the patient was admitted.

“Today the CDC confirmed the patient’s test was positive,” said the email from David Lubarsky, vice-chancellor of human health services, and Brad Simmons, interim CEO of UC Davis Medical Center.

“This is not the first COVID-19 patient we have treated, and because of the precautions we have had in place since this patient’s arrival, we believe there has been minimal potential for exposure here at UC Davis Medical Center,” the email said.

Nevertheless, a small number of medical center employees have been asked to stay home and monitor their temperatures.

Lubarsky and Simmons said the patient was transferred to UC Davis from “another Northern California hospital” on Wednesday, Feb 19.

“When the patient arrived, the patient had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” the email said.

“Since the patient arrived with a suspected viral infection, our care teams have been taking the proper infection prevention precautions during the patient’s stay.

“Upon admission, our team asked public health officials if this case could be COVID-19. We requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, since neither Sacramento County nor (the California Department of Public Health) is doing testing for coronavirus at this time. Since the patient did not fit the existing CDC criteria for COVID-19, a test was not immediately administered,” said the email, which added that, “UC Davis Health does not control the testing process.”

On Sunday, the CDC ordered COVID-19 testing of the patient and the patient was put on airborne precautions and strict contact precautions. The positive test results were announced on Wednesday.

“We are proud of our health care workers who have been working to care for this patient and are committed to saving this patient’s life,” the email said.

“Just as when a health care worker has a small chance of exposure to other illnesses, such as TB or pertussis, we are following standard CDC protocols for determination of exposure and surveillance. So, out of an abundance of caution, in order to assure the health and safety of our employees, we are asking a small number of employees to stay home and monitor their temperature.

“We are handling this in the same way we manage other diseases that require airborne precautions and monitoring. We are in constant communication with the state health department and the CDC and Sacramento County Public Health about the optimal management of this patient and possible employee exposures,” the email said.

“As we regularly handle patients with infectious diseases, we have robust infection control protocols in place to handle this patient and others with more frequently seen infectious diseases. In this case, we are dedicated to providing the best care possible for this patient and continuing to protect the health of our employees who care for them.”

The CDC announced on Wednesday that a case of novel coronavirus of “unknown origin” — without a relevant travel history or exposure to another known patient — had been diagnosed in a patient in Northern California but did not indicate what city or county the case was in.

In a press released issued Wednesday evening, the state Department of Public Health revealed the individual was from Solano County.

“The health risk from novel coronavirus to the general public remains low at this time,” the release said. “While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate. From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80 percent do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date. California is carefully assessing the situation as it evolves.”

“Keeping Californians safe and healthy is our number one priority,” said State Public Health Officer Dr. Sonia Angell.

“This has been an evolving situation, which California has been monitoring and responding to since COVID-19 cases first emerged in China last year. This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know.

“We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California. That’s why California has been working closely with federal and local partners, including health care providers and hospitals, since the outbreak was first reported in China — and we are already responding.”

This would be the first known instance of person-to-person transmission in the general public in the United States, according to Angell.

Previously known instances of person-to-person transmission in the United States include one instance in Chicago, Ill., and one in San Benito County. Both cases were after close, prolonged interaction with a family member who returned from Wuhan, China, and had tested positive for COVID-19, the disease caused by novel coronavirus. As of Wednesday, including this case, California has had seven travel-related cases, one close contact case and now one community transmission.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 3; communityspread; corona; coronavirus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
From a local paper...
1 posted on 02/26/2020 6:24:22 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Published about 20 minutes ago


2 posted on 02/26/2020 6:25:07 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Detailed info about newest US patient...


3 posted on 02/26/2020 6:27:21 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

No Problem. We got this.

4 posted on 02/26/2020 6:27:59 PM PST by Dogbert41 (Jerusalem is the city of the Great King!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

It’s blowing around in the wind.


5 posted on 02/26/2020 6:31:14 PM PST by chris37 (Impeach Chief Obama Injustice Roberts, a fraud, a clown and a tyrant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

If the patient is intubated, the patient is very sick.


6 posted on 02/26/2020 6:34:01 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freee-dame

Notice that the patient was in a different hospital BEFORE being transferred here...


7 posted on 02/26/2020 6:34:51 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

The absurd overreaction continues apace. So reminiscent of the Ebola scare. Can’t wait to buy the bargains on Wall St.


8 posted on 02/26/2020 6:35:01 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

So this person was already deathly ill(Already on a ventilator) on February 19th, probably a few days prior to do that..so that’s already what, 9 days..so if no one else gets infected in the next week or so Id say that is good sign


9 posted on 02/26/2020 6:37:23 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
The absurd overreaction continues apace. So reminiscent of the Ebola scare. Can’t wait to buy the bargains on Wall St.

I don't think it's the same. This disease is much wider spread. It's not as deadly, but 20% of those who get it will end up like the person here....very sick and needing medical treatment.

10 posted on 02/26/2020 6:37:24 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
So this person was already deathly ill(Already on a ventilator) on February 19th, probably a few days prior to do that..so that’s already what, 9 days..so if no one else gets infected in the next week or so Id say that is good sign

Yah, but how long before Feb 9 was he/she having symptoms or infecting others? I would give it two or three weeks. I think the CDC is going to be working very hard tracing this persons path.

11 posted on 02/26/2020 6:38:52 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Some say it can take 30 days to become infected, some say 14 days, the numbers game is everywhere


12 posted on 02/26/2020 6:39:31 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Pretty detailed but they left out the important part. Is this an Asian American or not.


13 posted on 02/26/2020 6:39:55 PM PST by TermLimits4All (A coup on the people's President, will result in bloodshed. Be prepared always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

There are only around 65,000 ventilators in the US. That number is far too small if a major epidemic occurs. This doesn’t even count the lack of trained RNs and PAs who know how to treat critically ill patients. You will also need thousands of respiratory therapists to do the day to day therapy for those on ventilators.


14 posted on 02/26/2020 6:40:32 PM PST by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TermLimits4All

I skimmed the article. Did I miss the factors that led them to do the test in the first place. They surely arent going to test everyone who has flu symptoms


15 posted on 02/26/2020 6:41:08 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TermLimits4All
Pretty detailed but they left out the important part. Is this an Asian American or not.

Good question...odds are good though.

16 posted on 02/26/2020 6:41:51 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
How would this patient know if he or she had come into contact with someone who had this disease, since evidently there aren't symptoms, from it, immediately? And it's an airborne disease, so someone with it, could have been somewhere he or she was and sneezed or coughed into the air.

Not trying to be argumentative, just asking a question that probably has no answer.

17 posted on 02/26/2020 6:42:01 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“Upon admission, our team asked public health officials if this case could be COVID-19. We requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, since neither Sacramento County nor (the California Department of Public Health) is doing testing for coronavirus at this time. Since the patient did not fit the existing CDC criteria for COVID-19, a test was not immediately administered,” said the email, which added that, “UC Davis Health does not control the testing process.”

On Sunday, the CDC ordered COVID-19 testing of the patient and the patient was put on airborne precautions and strict contact precautions. The positive test results were announced on Wednesday.


18 posted on 02/26/2020 6:43:18 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I certainly hope that the CDC does just that!


19 posted on 02/26/2020 6:44:16 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
How would this patient know if he or she had come into contact with someone who had this disease, since evidently there aren't symptoms, from it, immediately? And it's an airborne disease, so someone with it, could have been somewhere he or she was and sneezed or coughed into the air.

I don't know the answer to that but you can bet the CDC will be trying to find out...

20 posted on 02/26/2020 6:44:30 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson