The following comments are from my website scrolled to after the article on Parkland Florida and the war on the NRA which should have been about the promise policies used at that school.
The leadership of the so called political opposition (Republican) will wonder why as they lose a crucial election because of their inability to stand on principles. When Presidential actions should have been denouced and the police defended. When as President Obama initiated his racial division policy through the abuse of the “Bully Pulpit’ which went unchalanged and subsequently led to attacks on law enforcement. The only person to courageously do so was Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke and has because he is black received the “Uncle Tom” treatment
Clarke decried Obama’s abuse of the “Bully Pulpit” to create racial division which wound up using other similar incidents such as Ferguson MO and NYC.. Where Obama supported by the media would defend the attacker resisting arrest killed in the struggle over a law officers gun. Alledging the attacker was an “unarmed victim” of police brutality because he was black. Subsequently. There were continuous attacks on police ending up in a score of deaths.It Began when Obama used a non descript incident known as The Zimmerman trial and encouraged racial division through his twice use of the “Bully Pulpit”
. Obama defended the black attacker who was killed (a 17 year old 5’11 175 pound Trayvon Martin) by a 40 something year old 5’6” black hispanic (Jorge Zimmerman) working security in an integrated housing complex that was attacked by Martin knocking Zimmerman to the ground and the black youth was killed in a struggle over Zimmerman’s gun.
The media portayed the incident as Martin was an innocent black youth murdered in cold blood because he was black and the guard as a white hispanic guarding an exclusive white “gated”community .
Obama used the incident to declare racial division by using the “Bully Pulpit” declaring Martin was a victim of whites who could have been; First; “his son”, then; Obama himself.
When that inflammatory defense was picked by black gangs It also wound up and was used as an excuse to commit a score of racial assaults ending in deaths and serious injuries.
All the while this was happening in various areas of the country Such as the murder of an Australian visitor from Melbourne Christopher Lane killed while exercising on a Duncan Oklahoma street by members of the black gang known as the Crypts.
Such assaults were described by the press as “black youths with nothing better to do” Although there were some gang members who admitted their assaults were “for Trayvon” but met by stony silence from the democrats or denial from MSM because initially it was dismissed as a Obama miss-speak. As if he didn’t rely on a teleprompter for carefully prepared text checked out by advisers giving him the facts.
Shamefully members of the opposition so called Republicans chose not to condemn this but convenient to ignore. Thus demonstrate they are politically dysfunctional. Unwilling to work with or even recognize legitimate concerns from what they call the tea party who in reality are the Reagan voters of 2016 and unable to congeal into a unified working political unit. They did not learn from 2012,2014 and some continue to blow off 2016. http://www.theusmat.com/index.htm
I am wondering if anyone can get justice when a democrat is the defendant. I hope this lawsuit pans out, but if the case is tried in Miami, there likely would be ‘jury nullification’ and the defendants would get off scot-free.
‘Jury nullification’ got it’s more recent start in the O J Simpson trial. Probably that is why now McCabe won’t be tried as the DC Court would let him off. The opposite is why Roger Stone is facing maybe 9 years in prison. Including Obama/Clinton appointed judges, taking the law into their own hands to make sure anyone who disagrees with their political point of view gets convicted and is sent away.
Change of venue could be in play. I really hope Mr Zimmerman gets justice. That whole incident caused a lot of misery in our country.
Something I point out is that there were really two separate encounters that night.
The first, essentially instigated by Zimmerman as he looked to Martin, ended when Martin had successfully left the area and could have, had he chosen to, gone home.
The first encounter did not end in Martin’s death.
The second encounter started when Martin, already free and clear, decided to turn back and confront Zimmerman and it was this decision, one made entirely by Martin who alone was responsible for it, that led to his death.
I do not know why Martin chose to do this but I suspect it was because he felt disrespected and by the time he saw Zimmerman he had decided to beat the crap out of him for that cause alone.
Being disrespected is not a valid cause to engage in a felony assualt, one with intent, so while I feel confident to say on account of Martin being behind the second encounter that he did not die because he was black he did probably die for his own sense of what might be called blackness.