Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HoneysuckleTN
Have heard that the Victoria Secret models are really transgendered men. Looking at that models midsection and neck it looks like it's possibly a man.
955 posted on 02/20/2020 9:44:39 AM PST by Aquamarine (Where we go one, we go all. ~ Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies ]


To: Aquamarine

Do all “cut” abdominal muscles have a face hidden in them?
Just askin...for a fren.


956 posted on 02/20/2020 9:50:39 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

To: Aquamarine

They worship baphomet.


975 posted on 02/20/2020 10:30:28 AM PST by smileyface (I LOVE POTUS DONALD J. TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

To: Aquamarine

Have heard that the Victoria Secret models are really transgendered men. Looking at that models midsection and neck it looks like it’s possibly a man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes. I started following this content after that statue on the right of Baphomet was installed over legal objections in some state. I was horrified that a cult which kills and eats children would portray children looking up at Baphomet in adoration.

That Baphomet style was on display in that video of the wild Satanic ceremony honoring the opening of a tunnel in Europe.

Baphomet has traits of both male and female (breasts) and the primary goat like dancer in the Satanic ceremony appeared to be male with breasts. It’s a recurrent them.

So I began looking and found many examples among celebrities, athletes (that’s why they want transgendered men in competions), models etc. I kept pointing things out to a macho male friend and he didn’t believe me (laughed) , until I sent him the image of a Sports Illustrated cover model. I thought it would be hard to perceive because it took me so much time to “see it”, but once glance and he shouted, “EWWWW!!”

I believe this is both Baphomet worship and an attempt to indoctrinate, because the public is being trained that the image of desirability is Baphomet. By that I mean, show men scantily clad “women” until their desire adjusts to that slightly off presentation of “women”, and then reveal tot hem that they are desiring a genetic male, and then work to lower their resistance ot the thought of desiring males because their perceptions have been trained thus.

Same with women. For example, women’s cosmetic adds or Victoria Secret models have defined jaws and “impossibly” small hips (incapable of child bearing) and this becomes the unobtainable goal for presentability among women, and they note that men desire that look. Alhtough Harvey Weinstein is repulsive to all women, one of his rape victims testified that he had no testicals and his penis resembled a vagina.

I think this is part of the reason behind the “breeding programs” that Epstein was involved in because it’s necessary to start hormone therapy very early to get the desired look.

I am not going to try to convince anyone of who is/isn’t believed to be male/female in the online community; it’s something that one has to research for themselves.

But I will say the easiest markers are the narrow hips (but padding and implants available), wide jaw (note how massive sculpted jaws came into fashion), a heavier brow ridge on the skull, flat contouring on the wrists (men’s dont’ narrow as much as women), long arms that seem a bit gangley (see the “Angel” model). Adam’s apples are apparent in older trans celebrities but are much reduced or absent on younger.
Trans men are hardest to detect - Harvey Weinstein? I’ve seen the demonstrations but still have such a hard time accepting much of this.

Helps if you look at pictures of known trans women (Beauty p agents for trans) to begin to see the sharper features etc.)
I have to say, it takes time and effort to even consider this facet of our society. How do all those trans celebrities “have children”? There’s an industry that supplies realistic looking “moon bumps” (silicon type “bellies” to wear) which are available in graduated sizes to portray an increasingly growing fetus. Oh, and then mere days after child birth, the “woman” proudly shows off how she “lost all that baby weight” and resumes daily gym workouts.

Yes - if you are thinking this is crazy and impossible, I hear you. But that “angel” is no angel nor is he genetically female. Ironic, no? That Satanists would create fake Angels?


1,037 posted on 02/20/2020 1:14:10 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

To: Aquamarine

me: I believe this is both Baphomet worship and an attempt to indoctrinate, because the public is being trained that the image of desirability is Baphomet. By that I mean, show men scantily clad “women” until their desire adjusts to that slightly off presentation of “women”, and then reveal tot hem that they are desiring a genetic male, and then work to lower their resistance ot the thought of desiring males because their perceptions have been trained thus.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I forgot the aspect that women are being trained to desire trans “men”. When surveyed about what both sexes find attractive in the opposite sex, men’s lists start with breasts, hips and women’s lists start with “friendly eyes.” So trans “men” icons (models, actors, etc.) have the feminine friendly embracing gaze of genetic females in the stature of a male. Women are really flattered and encouraged to trust that feminized gaze (looks less threatening, aqressive etc.) and at the same time are being socialized through programming to view traditonal masculinity as rampaging violence and disgust of emotions or caring. Hence we get “toxic masculinity” ‘educational materials’ in school and programming.

Strangely Satanic - encouraging people to seek their comforts - the sexes are being encouraged not to tolerate natural differences in men and women because they don’t have to; men can socialize with “women” who look them over with an sexually aggressive glance and women can socialize with “men” whom they find understand (prioritize) so much of women’s concerns and are not aggressive or threatening.


1,059 posted on 02/20/2020 2:38:27 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson