And we DID know THIS long before they bragged about it
in the impeachment... ;-)
darbymcgill, you may find the posts at the top of the thread helpful in learning what the purpose of Q is. Predicting dates is not among those purposes; our enemies read Q drops avidly and releasing specific dates would alert them to white hat actions.
I’ve often seen repeated requests for proof that Q predicted specific dates, despite all the information we provide which indicates that this is not the purpose of Q. These requests are usually attempts at debunking Q. Since we’re using the true purpose of Q as our criteria, and know that Q is serving that purpose, there’s no point in our spending time on such attempts at debunking.
For those who need proof that Q predicted specific dates in order to consider Q information worth investigating, I think it’s best that they wait for events to unfold which inspire their interest. Each of us must dig for ourselves and can’t rely on others to provide reassurance.
Meanwhile, those of us who already found out for ourselves confirmation that Q’s stated purpose is in play continue to dig.
I don't know what the big deal is. Did somebody run and tell mommy?
I simply asked a question about dates. Very simple question. I said nothing about debunking nor expectations.
We've had 1000's of decoders, here and on 8K trying to figure out what Q posts are trying to tell us.. When someone thinks they've figured out a clue, they run over here and post it..
I've even seen Q send out confirmations when someone figures out a clue.
I'm seriously at a loss to see what is the problem asking if we've decoded any dates successfully. How is that any different than asking "has anyone figured out what Q means by the 'Silent War Continues'..." Seriously?
And we DID know THIS long before they bragged about it
in the impeachment... ;-)