It is a standard arrangement that the Secret Service provide payment to homeowners for space used by the agency in such situations. The Clintons did not take it upon themselves to “charge the Secret Service rent.” The amount provided is based on a government formula, not set by the homeowner, and in the Clintons’ case this amount was $1,100. (Note that this figure was not chosen by the Clintons, and it was well short of their monthly mortgage payment.)
It"s standard journalistic practice to exclude exculpatory information if a Republican ox is being gored.
[ It”s standard journalistic practice to exclude exculpatory information if a Republican ox is being gored. ]
That’s for sure. Keeps the liberal lemmings outraged and stupid with limited information. Works for the “evening news” propaganda masters.
@post 17 — This is the truth
This was settled before on this website with citations when the prior Presidents did this (I believe W and Clinton both suffered this story). I also believe OMB or the Secret Service did a press release stating the same. You would likely see the same story of the new Obama mansion in the Vineyard had a guesthouse.
This is a story that is deliberately twisting the truth.
The story also neglects to point out something that a surprising number of Americans are still unaware of - that Trump donates his entire salary to charity and that the Trump’s as a corporate entity have lost money considering they are not growing at a time of unprecedented economic growth in our nation as well as the boycotts of their branded properties and clubs by liberals.
Thanks for posting the truth gundog - FRegards
Lies by omission are lies. The pravda press is pushing classist bullstalin propaganda in an election year.
Where is yourube and schitter to ding them for spreading manure?
Yes.
Basically, you can ignore this article, and if anyone brings it up, call them a naive dolt to their face.