Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

the United States Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously that the First Amendment right to free speech did not forbid states from banning the sale of material depicting children engaged in sexual activity, even if the material was not obscene.


854 posted on 02/07/2020 4:40:16 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Men: We live one day at a time and scratch where it itches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

18 U.S. Code § 2251A. Selling or buying of children.


856 posted on 02/07/2020 4:41:59 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Men: We live one day at a time and scratch where it itches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

18 U.S.C. § 2260
the production of the visual depiction involved the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct


857 posted on 02/07/2020 4:42:19 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Men: We live one day at a time and scratch where it itches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

What is this in connection with? And how could “ material depicting children engaged in sexual activity” NOT be obscene and illegal by its very nature???? When was this ruling?


866 posted on 02/07/2020 4:57:05 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson