Why are you blaming the 12 year old when she did not make the rules? She probably had no idea of them prior going to the hospital.
Send the bill to the democrat who made the rule in the first place.
Read my post. Not blaming the kid.
Not blaming the 12 year-old at all. Just setting the ground rules for parental access.
Did the same thing with our kids when they headed off to college. We couldn’t access their grades online without their permission. We pointed out...”We don’t see your grades, we don’t pay your tuition.”.
Who would promptly claim that it "proves we need universal health care."
If the doctors get cut off at least they have some voice with the public and UIHC to press for a repeal.
UIHC spokesman Tom Moore said that the medical provider is currently reviewing the policy after several parents expressed concerns that age 12 is too young for parents to be barred from having access to their child's medical records.
"That review is not finished yet, but we plan to share the revised practice within a matter of months," Moore told The Gazette.
"Several parents" nets a "review."
A group of high cash flow doctors losing a chunk of revenue and showing up as a group will stand a much better chance at getting a change, not a "review."
.