[Ingtar]

There should be witnesses for the defense only and they should have carte blanche in their choices. Any prosecution witnesses should have been called in the House. The only exception is if any new crime or clarification of a crime is needed. No crimes, so no Dim witnesses.

[Responsibility2nd]

Any prosecution witnesses should have been called in the House

 

Repeat in large font for emphasis.

Any prosecution witnesses should have been called in the House

They want Bolton to testify? The should have called him before the House. When they could have.

[MHGinTN]

The house dwarves keep emphasizing this '17 witnesses'. Actually, there were eighteen. The eighteenth one which the house dwarves want to hide is the lynchpin through which the entire fraudulent 'whisleblower' is hanged.

Philbin has nailed why NO WITNESSES should be called now that the articles are in the Senate. The House clowns did not do a thorough job bringing articlezs of indictment but now they try to force the Senate to do clean-up and hold an indictment proceeding at the trial stage. That is bullshit only the demon rat minds can conceive. And Schumer wants it so the Senate is tied up well into the summer not affirming judges and not handling legislative responsibilities. The evil is thick with these dwarves. And they have their blackmailed chief sitting as judge so they will get whatever they demand if this is allowed to be pushed into calling witnesses who were ignored by the House clowns.