[Bob Ireland]

***The House, if they disagree with (any) POTUS on any of his actions/decisions, can vote to impeach - no crime need be evident***

I was posting some weeks ago that this precedent would set up a parliamentary system of government without a Constitutional amendment. The Senate should have dealt with this in the most severe terms.

A parliamentary system lacks our stability - look at Israel right now. However, such a change suits the Dem Party dreams for more power and control.

[txnativegop]

a parliamentary system is what the Dems want, it is the first step to a totalitarian system for them. IMO

[Snowybear]

> A parliamentary system lacks our stability - look at Israel right now. However, such a change suits the Dem Party dreams for more power and control.

Truer and wiser words were never spoken. But they were considered. And we fight for it. In various forms when required and not until.

So sayeth I, Snowy Bear.

-SB

[Disestablishmentarian]

The Senate should have dealt with this in the most severe terms.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I am hoping for about 56-44 vote to acquit (including 3 RATS: Jones AL, Manchin WV and Sinema AZ).

This would rebuke the House and hopefully put the impeachment genie back in the bottle.

I can imagine an even higher acquittal vote on the absurd "Obstruction of Congress" Article.

We are about to find out if there is even a tiny iota of integrity amongst the RAT Senators.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: this precedent would set up a parliamentary system of government ::

I noted that about three threads ago and the conservative talking heads are saying it recently, also.

To see the end goal of this, take a look at GBR, or watch the BritCom “Yes, Minister!”/”Yes, Prime Minister!” Sir Appleby is the consummate Deep Stater (SES). It’s available in clips on YouTube and full seasons (3) on AmazonPrimeVideo.