Q Anon: 12/31/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.203, Q Day 795

qmap.pub ^ | 12/31/19 | FReepers, vanity

[RitaOK]

You pretty much nailed it!

I do expect a Trump’s 2020 Re-election to enable him to run a major operation against this Whole Democrat Illegal Voting Block of socialists and Marxists, to round ‘em up and clean ‘em out the USA, starting with blue-battling TEXAS, and all the southern border states.

Sanctuary City Status, for harboring illegals and criminals needs to hit the Justice Department,the Supreme Court and the National Guard. Foreign invasion can not be deemed constitutional in any form or fashion. Blockade these un-American city territories.

[mo]

we should just shutter yet another useless, dysfunctional, anti-American federal agency..

[little jeremiah]

Sounds likely that illegals won’t try to get the enhanced DL then, probably just used forged docs no matter what. Sounds as though forged docs won’t work so well with enhanced.

[little jeremiah]

Fed funding for all institutions of higher learning should be cancelled. And public schools should be locally/state funded. That alone would solve many problems.

[little jeremiah]

Hmm, POTUS went the last couple of times. Or however many it was. More important stuff to do, probably.

[RitaOK]

Absolutely.

Wonder why she didn’t, ever, and does not now, publicly?

I think she will maybe turn out to be retained, figure headed, but used as a Witness, surely as a trove for evidence of that which she has seen and possibly unseen, in order to collect her pay check.

Her little peeps surfacing now, about “risks”, seem a little grasping given the scales of justice being balanced by Attorney General Barr.

[VRWCarea51]

#773 Strzok was the interviewer, whom was advised by Lisa Page to go easy on her, ‘she may be Potus’ soon.

It was Lynch who approved of the immunity agreement.
Remember that was the reason Comey bypassed her on charging Ole Crusty. Well, that and the “secret tarmac” meeting between Bent one and Lynch.

[mbrfl]

Interesting info. you bring up about Hillary and N. Ireland. I hadn’t heard that before. Do we have an extradition treaty with Northern Ireland?

[bagster]

Now we can stop this topic—I hope.

Nope. You don't get to be wrong AND have the last word.

No, Bitt said, “any one here born in the 40s is now in their 9th decade”. (She did not use the word during) The use of the term “their” personalizes it - implying that they have lived for 90 years.itt said, “any one here born in the 40s is now in their 9th decade”. (She did not use the word during) The use of the term “their” personalizes it - implying that they have lived for 90 years.

IN THEIR 9th DECADE implies that they LIVED DURING 9 DECADES.

Example. I lived in the 50's through the 20's.for a total of 8 decades. I have lived in and during 8 decades (and yet I'm only 60). Bitt's husband, having lived in the 40's, has lived in and during 9 decades.

I'm sure Bitt knows if her husband is 90 or not. Anyway, this one is real easy to solve. Ask bitt what she meant. I guarantee she meant the same thing that I just explained to you.

#BagsterAlwaysRight

#NowWeCanStop

[greeneyes]

LOL. You are WRONG, but that’s ok, I don’t mind if you live in ignorance. I like you anyway. LOL

[bagster]

As noted by Cletus, The decade of the 20s begins approximately 365 days from 1/1/2020. So you should not yet be counting the 20s even if you want to depersonalize the term.

p.s. The decade of the 20's began one second after midnight on 1-1-20.

We are now INSIDE THE 20th year of this century. There is nothing 2019 about it.

Just like a newborn baby is INSIDE his first year of life the moment it's born. No more zeros.

[bagster]

LOL. You are WRONG, but that’s ok, I don’t mind if you live in ignorance. I like you anyway. LOL

I like you too, greeneyes. Even if you know I'm right but are too stubborn to admit it.

[RitaOK]

You’re correct. Personal attorney Kendall was charged with the official separation of Hilltoppel’s private and State Dept emails. A Thumb drive was kept in his safe, preparing for the Benghazi inquiry and prior to Gowdy’s investigation. Is that right, do you think?

But, you’re right about Cheryl Mills also, overseeing an initial separation, located in the “basement” of the State Dept. I distinctly remember the two other gals selected for doing the cutting and culling were highly placed, capable staffers (one an attorney herself, I think) and both under the supervision of Huma, and Cheryl.

Then there was that Colorado outfit who held HRC’s home server. It’s exhausting, all the dodges and weaves to be followed on Hillary’s Army of fixers, finders and keepers, and electronic movers, cover up artists, shippers and political assassins.

It will take a battalion just to track Hillary’s web, alone. Unraveling it will be a monumental task.

[greeneyes]

Cooper had a lot of interesting things to say that do seem to make the less than truthful history we are taught a little more comprehensible (admittedly in a very strange way)

but if the hidden hands behind our visible rulers are as powerful as he says (aliens or extra-dimensional beings???) then why is it taking thousands of years for them to gain complete control of this world?

With powers not of this earth their new order should have been a done deal a long time ago.
**************************************************************************************************

Good point. In later years, Cooper stated that he thought that maybe his superiors embellished things in order to be able to discredit whistleblowers, as some of the stuff would be unbelievable. Purposeful lies.

[greeneyes]

LOL. Pffft. I understand your point—I simply disagree. And that’s ok—we don’t have to agree on everything.

[bagster]

And that’s ok—we don’t have to agree on everything.

It's not okay.

It will only be okay when everyone agrees with me.

#FactsNotOpinions

#TruthIsTruth

#BornInThe50s

[CJ Wolf]

#itwillneverbeokaythenforyou

Happy New Year bags!

[RitaOK]

All I know is that extradition is common and particularly so between Western countries.

There is discussion about any nation’s right to decline an extradition request, for their own reasons. An example, I think of is Assange. Or, Snowden.

Seems a nation who suspects a “political persecution” is the motive behind an extradition *request* can more safely be declined on moral grounds. Two nations may disagree on that question, of course.

However, nations like to generally cooperate with one another, in the event that they too request an extradition sometime in the future.

Northern Ireland is a messy Leftist haven for Hillary, who may be inclined to lionize Hillary, not extradite her carcass.

(Frankly, I’m ignorant on the NI independence from IRELAND as a whole, on which of the two is authorized to grant or deny a Request.)

[greeneyes]

It’s not okay.
It will only be okay when everyone agrees with me.
#FactsNotOpinions
#TruthIsTruth
#BornInThe50s
***************************************************************************************
Pfft. Not happening.

[bagster]

Pfft. Not happening.

#itwillneverbeokaythenforyou

Then I shall...

Sidenote:

I made the above meme a long time ago...Guess where I just found it? Google image search. Can I sue Google for copyright infringement?