What’s your main malfunction?
I function just fine honey.
Your sorry accusation is thinly based upon a silly false premise.
Your snide comment would normally deserve a bugger off comment, but I’ll won’t reply that way.
My main POINT was not a “malfunction” it was a thoughtfully researched offer to understand how media is controlling the thought processes of populations who are unaware. This point was made clearly, to which I received an obtuse, thoughtless empty, whiny “what would we ever do with ourselves without our suicidal media?” reply. It deserved the reply I issued.
Then you can along with your garbage knee jerk reaction that implies I malfunction.
You have no less manners than that which you accuse me.
Give it a rest.
Q has TOLD us that predictive programming is what is being done to our populations. It is the heart of the long Q post about media . Q just never named it for what it is in a technical sense and the depth and depravity to which it is employed.
This thinking of mine is NOT malfunctioning.
When I called it what it is, what’s the first reply?
A whine....
Clutching pearls...
“How can we live without social media?”
THERE IS THE MALFUNCTION.