The participants of the PISA tests represented the wealthiest parts of China. Critics say this means the Pisa results did not represent the entire country.
Posted on 12/04/2019 4:10:48 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Chinese teenagers ranked as the world’s best students according to results from a closely watched global survey announced on Tuesday. But unlike in the rest of the world, in China, the victory was met with a resounding shrug.
The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a standardized test for 15-year-old students around the world in reading, math and science. It’s administered every three years, with 79 countries participating.
The Pisa, as the test is widely known, is regarded as one of the most important ways to directly compare different educational systems. China beat out education powerhouse Singapore and its results far outstripped the West.
However, for some Chinese educators, the top scores in Pisa are an unwelcome confirmation of the systemic flaws in Chinese education.
“It is misleading to take the Pisa test result as a vote of confidence in our education system,” Xiong Bingqi, deputy director of the 21st Century Education Research Institute in Beijing, told Inkstone.
He said China’s high test scores often result in teachers neglecting important soft skills that are integral in real-life situations.
As a standardized test, Pisa encourages the exact kind of rigorous test-prepping education that Chinese students spend years perfecting, said Xiong.
“Chinese schools are very behind in sparking students’ interest in learning or nurturing a creative and curious mindset,” he added.
In recent years, China has been trying to reignite education reforms that emphasize creative thinking and life skills over test-preparation. But this has been trialed on a regional, not national, basis.
Regional reforms have faced strong opposition from parents. They argue that the gaokao, a grueling college entrance exam, defines the education system in China.
Unless it is overhauled nationally and systemically, their kids run the risk of performing poorly on the gaokao against school districts that emphasize rote learning and test preparation. A student’s performance in the gaokao may impact them for the rest of their lives.
A parent in Jiangsu province, one of the regions selected for the most recent Pisa test, said in October that it was “irresponsible” for working-class Chinese families who see standardized testing as the only fair way to improve their social status to stop their kids from studying hard.
Chen Jing, a Shenzhen-based social commentator, agreed, telling Inkstone: “The win in Pisa is good news for those parents who are boycotting education reforms to make school easier.”
Chen, who is against making school easier, said that by emphasizing grades Chinese schools create an environment that promotes hard work. Many Chinese parents fundamentally disagree with the concept that education should be enjoyable, encouraging and happy, he added.
One of the other reasons why some Chinese experts were less than enthusiastic about the Pisa win was the perception that the students tested in the assessment do not represent the entire country.
The test takers were from relatively wealthy areas: Shanghai, Beijing, Zhejiang (the province just south of Shanghai) and Jiangsu (the province just north of Shanghai).
“By choosing students from these four regions, we have elevated China’s performance,” said Chen.
China’s eastern provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang have consistently ranked in the top 5 of the country’s wealthiest regions. The capital city of Beijing and the eastern metropolis of Shanghai have long been China’s, and increasingly Asia’s, top-ranking cities for education.
Rather than taking a victory lap, the results of the Pisa test were another reason for Chinese experts to debate the merits and flaws of the country’s brutally competitive test-based educational system.
Because they flunked words beginning with the letter L?
If anyone thinks any foreign company or group is going to be allowed to conduct a free, unbiased mass survey, poll or measure of the Chinese population, they are a fool.
For obvious political and power reasons, the Chinese Government will never allow such thing. If such a survey is allowed, it will be under their watchful eyes and “partnership.” Local officials, to avoid being embarrassed, will make sure the right schools and right students are involved.
“In recent years, China has been trying to reignite education reforms that emphasize creative thinking and life skills over test-preparation.”
Ha. That’s good news for us.
China will never be able to beat our diversity.
[“In recent years, China has been trying to reignite education reforms that emphasize creative thinking and life skills over test-preparation.”
Ha. That’s good news for us.]
Two of my daughters were part of a sister cities exchange and I can say with authority that the Chinese students that came to America did not behave like the other student nationalities. The Chinese students were not behaving badly or rudely, they were just very quiet and passive as if they had never had much free time while growing up for social interaction with their peers.
Don't tell me that you believe that leftist trope “Diversity is strength” because that is just a load of crap. Balkanized countries disintegrate via civil war, just ask the people from the Balkans.
Chinese parents rate their duty to prepare their children for financial success much more highly than we do.
Different, not necessarily better or worse, ethos.
I think he was being sarcastic.
So, you’re saying the Chinese collections of national test scores are guaranteed to be thoroughly cooked.
They certainly have the power to make that happen, and are not shy about wielding such power.
China reluctantly admits its producing test-taking drones without charm or personality. I’d call that progress.
Girls: China has fewer.
PISA shet test and fake results...
“China will never be able to beat our diversity”. And our diversity gets us what in a competitive world? Lot’s of different food choices is all I count. Japanese lack of diversity never hampered their competitiveness. It will likewise not hamper the Chinese, and the Chines have 10 times the population of Japan.
No one just shows up in China and starts conducting social research. Impossible. Its only allowed if its something China is interested in, and then is 100% on their own terms.
Go to any where smart people congregate like medicine, science and even law and you will find Jews and East Asians very well represented. In fact, over represented.
Let’s hear it for Hernstien and Murray’s Bell Curve. The book tells us who the smart people are.
[So, you’re saying the Chinese collections of national test scores are guaranteed to be thoroughly cooked.
They certainly have the power to make that happen, and are not shy about wielding such power.]
These educators there are smart enough to realize engineering is all spur of the moment with what you’ve got. Not rote memorization
Think mcguyver. My nickname
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.