The WOODS PROCEDURE seems to be the Only substantive Case checkmate against corrupt practices.
Either the WOODS process is laughably loose like a sieve, ignored, or it is Airtight and deadly serious, certain to deliver *criminally* prosecutable consequences to any agent facing off with WOODS, who dares to feloniously lie, forge and/or otherwise misrepresent falsified evidence or FRAME a case against anyone, deemed to be a potential FBI Target.
One or “tuther”. Period. WOODS violations need to be pursued Criminally in all cases. If something was then found to be an unKnowable error, then dismiss the criminal liability.
Are those danged procedures even reviewed, in a remotely Serious test for fallibility????? I think not.
This is how Adam Schiff got Guiliani’s phone records (thread)…
https://twitter.com/RoscoeBDavis1/status/1202028467790979074
Interesting Twitter thread.
It makes the case that the call records were secured by
means of a “National Security Letter” that FBI Director
Chris Wray would have had to approve.
This should become very interesting soon. A national
security letter (NSL) is an administrative subpoena issued
by the United States government to gather information for
national security purposes. NSLs do not require prior
approval from a judge.
~Easy