>>Jim wrote, “It’s like, NONE of these people have heard of, are aware of, genetics, and how seemingly different species even contain SOME IDENTICAL DNA.”
What is the implication of your statement, Jim?
Mr. Kalamata
re: “What is the implication of your statement, Jim?”
The majority of objectors to Darwin seem to be totally unknowledgeable when it comes to DNA, and instead insist on studying outward manifestation of traits of whatever is being ‘studied’, hence, “phrenology”.