Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jayster

No one has had a first glimpse into this.


3 posted on 11/23/2019 10:26:18 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DarthVader
Agreed. This is a classic case of "those who know aren't talking."

Those that claim to know are just spinning.

4 posted on 11/23/2019 10:27:43 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DarthVader

Correct. The IG FISA Abuse Report is over 500 pages and there’s no way one low FBI worker is the only one with criminal referrals. This is just the media attempting to do preemptive damage control.


8 posted on 11/23/2019 10:37:53 AM PST by White MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DarthVader

Only those who are involved in Principal Review have seen the report, and they only get to see the section that pertains to them, only in a SCIF, and only after signing a non-disclosure agreement.

Leakers would be instantly identifiable and subject to criminal penalties.

Moreover, since when does anyone with a brain believe CNN?


12 posted on 11/23/2019 10:46:01 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DarthVader
No one has had a first glimpse into this.

How can you say that? Is it from ignorance or from stupidity?

'Unusual restrictions' spook witnesses in DOJ inspector general investigation into alleged FISA abuses
Inspector General Michael Horowitz has invited witnesses and their lawyers to review relevant portions of a draft report, allowing them the opportunity to offer input and objections.

Witnesses?!

The Washington Post report also said witnesses were being asked to view these sections of the document, which is marked "Top Secret," in a secure area, must sign nondisclosure agreements, and have been told they are not allowed to remove any notes they make about the report.

It has been seen. That's why the leaks have started.

Damage control and control the narrative.

The people reviewing the report could be name dropping to divert attention away from themselves.

(also a means of controlling the narrative...only low level people are named)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/11/22/andrew_mccabe_on_doj_ig_findings_ive_agreed_not_to_speak_about_it_in_any_way_until_the_process_is_over.html?jwsource=cl

Note mention of NDA. He had access to secret/classified parts.

52 posted on 11/23/2019 1:38:24 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson