Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceX’s prototype Starship rocket partially bursts during testing in Texas
the verge ^ | Nov 20, 2019 | Loren Grush

Posted on 11/21/2019 3:00:35 AM PST by BenLurkin

A test version of SpaceX’s next-generation rocket, Starship, partially burst apart during ground tests in Texas today, erupting plumes of gas and sending some pieces of hardware soaring into the sky. Live streams set up by local space enthusiasts captured the failure in real time this afternoon.

The explosive result occurred while SpaceX was seemingly conducting some pressure tests with the vehicle at the company’s test site in Boca Chica, Texas. The local live streams showed the vehicle venting gas periodically throughout the day, indicating that testing was underway.

Now, that timeline is almost certain to shift. After the explosion, Musk indicated on Twitter that SpaceX may no longer fly this particular prototype and will instead conduct flight tests with a newer, more up-to-date model that the company planned to build. “This had some value as a manufacturing pathfinder, but flight design is quite different,” Musk wrote, referring to the prototype that burst.

(Excerpt) Read more at theverge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bocachica; elonmusk; fizzle; prototype; space; spacex; starship; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Viking2002

Bite me, a$$hole. I have degrees in physics and computer systems engineering.

You can disagree without making smarmy-ass comments.


41 posted on 11/21/2019 7:06:02 AM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why do I feel we have regressed back to the 1950s Russian space program? All the rocket designers from the golden age of NASA are dead. Didn’t they leave any technical knowledge on paper?


42 posted on 11/21/2019 7:58:02 AM PST by DownInFlames (Galsd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

What is your expertise in lift-to-orbit rocket design?


43 posted on 11/21/2019 8:02:24 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

In this case, you are WRONG.


44 posted on 11/21/2019 8:07:06 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Politics is the continuation of war by other means. --Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


45 posted on 11/21/2019 8:10:19 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Dear Mr. Kotter, #Epsteindidntkillhimself - Signed, Epstein's Mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames
...Why do I feel we have regressed back to the 1950s Russian space program?..

Do you realize that the Russian space program can still send people to the ISS? We lost that capability nearly a decade ago.

And, the rocket engines we fly from traditional vendors are ones we bought from Russia.

The Russians were first to orbit a satellite and first to put a man in space.

Time to take the lessons we should have learned to heart.

46 posted on 11/21/2019 8:17:56 AM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Do you realize that the Russian space program can still send people to the ISS? We lost that capability nearly a decade ago.

We could do that now, it's just a matter of more testing/improving of the Space X system. We can also send cargo up to the ISS and orbit for a fraction of the cost of NASA and the Russians. The Falcon 9, for example, averages out to $2,500/lb. It was about $10,000/lb for the Space Shuttle. That's not an insignificant achievement. The end goal is a cost in the $100s.

47 posted on 11/21/2019 8:22:40 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. - Dwight Eisenhower, 1957)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; fieldmarshaldj

My favorite YT channel for rocket stuff is SpaceXcentric (formerly the oddly-named Cloudlicker) — he gets to the story and to the point, and doesn’t attempt to be a morning DJ or be pedantic. My other fave is Scott Manley, and I think the two have actually collaborated at least once, so, bonus.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ee-xPdxfFc


48 posted on 11/21/2019 8:52:59 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

Only made possible by the development of slomo technology.


49 posted on 11/21/2019 12:43:47 PM PST by Waverunner (I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson