Kalamata:
"Roberts is not my buddy, Joey; and I would have to be stark-raving mad (or, at least, remarkably naive) to believe you." And yet here you are defending Roberts' arguments.
By your own Michael Shermer logic, that makes lunatic Roberts your hero & good buddy.
Kalamata on the charge of "holocaust denier": "That is exactly the way it happened, Joey.
This is the thread, in case you forgot:"
See... there's an example of how I know you are a natural born liar, seemingly you love to lie, even when you don't have to.
In this particular example, I never said you are a Holocaust denier, only that your tactics in denying reality are the same I experienced nearly 20 years ago debating real Holocaust deniers.
I even spelled out for you exactly what those tactics are -- generic tactics which can be applied to pretty much any subject.
But you never once addressed the reasons why you use denier tactics, you only repeatedly claimed I said you are a Holocaust denier.
Kalamata: "LOL! Joey has never debated a holocaust denier; and, like me, he has probably never met one."
And there it is again!
You have no knowledge of who I debated, when or how, and yet you chose to lie, saying it never happened.
It's true I never met the main deniers, just as I've not met other posters to Free Republic.
But they are the ones who first taught me the tactics of denial, tactics which you seem naturally born to.
Kalamata: "I don’t know, Joey.
I do know that your hero, the atheist Michael Shermer, uses the memory of the Holocaust to slander conservatives in one of his books, as do you when you get in serious trouble during debates."
So your hero Roberts slanders anyone of integrity, as do you when you get in serious trouble during debates.
Kalamata: "Research Joey’s posts if you want to see how a liar operates."
Research Danny’s posts if you want to see how a liar operates.
Kalamata: "Joey gets seriously frustrated when he is caught lying."
Danny lies for the sheer joy of it and doesn't even care how often he's caught at it.
Kalamata: "I am a scientist, so I will believe any empirical evidence that supports evolution.
However, as a scientist, I am also obliged to reject just-so stories disguised as science.
Joey, on the other hand, believes every just-so story with religious fervor, and if you don’t believe like he believes then you MUST be a science denier, a holocaust denier, and/or any other denier-label he can think of at the time (although he is careful not to label us climate-deniers, like his buddy Michael Shermer does!)"
All lies.
Kalamata: "Child."
Child. ![]()
>>Kalamata wrote: "Roberts is not my buddy, Joey; and I would have to be stark-raving mad (or, at least, remarkably naive) to believe you."
>>Joey wrote: "And yet here you are defending Roberts' arguments."
One or two.
*****************
>>Joey wrote: "By your own Michael Shermer logic, that makes lunatic Roberts your hero & good buddy."
No, that is another bit of your illogic, Joey.
*****************
>>Kalamata on the charge of "holocaust denier": "That is exactly the way it happened, Joey. This is the thread, in case you forgot:"
>>Joey wrote: "See... there's an example of how I know you are a natural born liar, seemingly you love to lie, even when you don't have to. In this particular example, I never said you are a Holocaust denier, only that your tactics in denying reality are the same I experienced nearly 20 years ago debating real Holocaust deniers. I even spelled out for you exactly what those tactics are -- generic tactics which can be applied to pretty much any subject."
Your tactics are called "slander by innuendo;" and, again, you have never debated a holocaust denier.
*****************
>>Joey wrote: "But you never once addressed the reasons why you use denier tactics, you only repeatedly claimed I said you are a Holocaust denier."
Those are your inventions, Joey. That is why they fit you so well.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "LOL! Joey has never debated a holocaust denier; and, like me, he has probably never met one."
>>Joey wrote: "And there it is again! You have no knowledge of who I debated, when or how, and yet you chose to lie, saying it never happened."
If you didn't lie so much, Joey, you would be more believable.
*****************
>>Joey wrote: "It's true I never met the main deniers, just as I've not met other posters to Free Republic. But they are the ones who first taught me the tactics of denial, tactics which you seem naturally born to."
Those are the kind of statements that make you unbelievable, Joey. My life-long system of acquiring knowledge is evidence-based, which you cannot seem to grasp. In my line of work I couldn't get away with making stuff up; nor would I have wanted to.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "I don’t know, Joey. I do know that your hero, the atheist Michael Shermer, uses the memory of the Holocaust to slander conservatives in one of his books, as do you when you get in serious trouble during debates."
>>Joey wrote: "So your hero Roberts slanders anyone of integrity, as do you when you get in serious trouble during debates."
Roberts is not my hero, Joey. You, on the other hand, specifically stated you admire and respect Shermer the Bigot .
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "Research Joey’s posts if you want to see how a liar operates."
>>Joey wrote: "Research Danny’s posts if you want to see how a liar operates."
I welcome it. I also welcome a scholarly debate. In the meantime, I will continue debating you.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "Joey gets seriously frustrated when he is caught lying."
>>Joey wrote: "Danny lies for the sheer joy of it and doesn't even care how often he's caught at it."
Joey lies so much it has become pathological.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "I am a scientist, so I will believe any empirical evidence that supports evolution. However, as a scientist, I am also obliged to reject just-so stories disguised as science. Joey, on the other hand, believes every just-so story with religious fervor, and if you don’t believe like he believes then you MUST be a science denier, a holocaust denier, and/or any other denier-label he can think of at the time (although he is careful not to label us climate-deniers, like his buddy Michael Shermer does!)"
>>Joey wrote: "All lies."
No, that is all true. This is proof of the last part:
Michael Shermer: Why Climate Skeptics Are Wrong
Make note that Shermer pushs the 97% myth about mid-article. He knows better:
Forbes: '97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong
Shermer and his right-hand man, Donald Prothero, make a good-living exposing "science-deniers," who are defined as those who find it hard to swallow the junk science of climate-changeism and evolutionism.
*****************
>>Kalamata wrote: "Child."
>>Joey wrote: "Child."
LOL! Silly Child!
Mr. Kalamata