Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

I know nothing about these devices, but I’m seriously doubting they easily cover all kinds of food AND all types of chemicals and viruses and bacteria, much less fast.

They should have that in hospitals, then. Maybe cut down on the waits for “what might have been poisoning/sickening patient”.


141 posted on 11/18/2019 10:22:12 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: the OlLine Rebel
Testing before something has been consumed is actually easier then doing it after.

but I’m seriously doubting they easily cover all kinds of food AND all types of chemicals and viruses and bacteria,

You are equating several different things. Chemicals, which is what poisons are, are detectable.

Viruses are rarely put in food. Much easier to just sneeze on him.

Bacteria is usually dealt with by just cooking the food and then not letting it set out. While there are a very few bacteria that can not be dealt with that way the easiest way to deal with them would be to hit the food with gamma rays. That would deal with any bacteria.

Might be why he eats his steaks well done.

157 posted on 11/18/2019 10:35:26 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (A hero is a hero no matter what medal they give him. Likewise a schmuck is still a schmuck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson