Is it your mission to push this psychotic ‘dieting’ nonsense to a new level of insanity by suggesting anything resembling “crash dieting” is safe or healthy?
WTF is wrong with people? With you? The article is bad enough by suggesting “it’s Ok to wait 10 years”, but damage wrought on the body over a period of years CANNOT be reversed in mere days.
The assertion is moronic, reckless and incredibly myopic. I’ve seen your posts: If you’re desperately seeking some magical solution to a persistent problem, perhaps we should chat.
But you really need to get a grip on this ‘dieting’ nonsense. “Crash diet for a week”??? GMAFB.
Rant over.
I think you will note dozens of FReepers have had immense success with reversing their health conditions through a lower carb approach over the past couple years in which I’ve been posting these studies. You could imagine I’m pretty happy we will have FReepers around a lot longer now.
One could ask, “Why not simply change one’s diet to using the Okinawa approach?” I’m not against such a diet, but any diet needs to be adhered to to succeed. People are finding that a low carb approach is pretty easy and provides very quick benefits. Their hunger goes away while accomplishing their goal. The other diets generally leave these same people hungry and their goals don’t get met because their bodies are out of whack. They have already over used carbs and eating high carb, but less, doesn’t work. They have abused carbs so much their liver and pancreas are dysfunctional.
As an illustration, I doubt doctors or friends would have much success telling functional drunks to simply cut down your drinking by 30% and you will get healthy again. Keep drinking 70% of what you do, because that won’t hurt you and people can easily manage 70% of their normal alcohol volume. It’s just the little extra that makes you dysfunctional.
Why is the drinking advice I offer bad or not a parallel of your dietary approach? Eating or drinking less is the key, right? Maybe shifting to drinking a different alcohol will do it, like changing to rice from bread?
This study shows positive results from subjects who had provably reversed diabetes and they were able to measure the amount of fat removal was needed for diabetes to go away.
I don’t see how your protest provides a substantive rebuttal to the study’s work. Can you elucidate your thoughts?
I like your rants, logi_cal869. It keeps you engaged and questioning and I know you mean well for others.