Posted on 11/07/2019 4:56:33 PM PST by Olog-hai
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo will unveil a statue of former US President Ronald Reagan at the US Embassy on Friday, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday. [ ]
For over 10 years, the United States has wanted to honor Reagan with a statue in Berlin. However, the administration of the capital had till now rejected numerous applications from US officials and dignitaries.
Berliners had mixed reactions to the new statue. One older woman told DW that she was not opposed to a statue of Reagan as the US had been a protecting power over West Germany.
But a man in his 30s told DW he was opposed to the statue. I wouldnt be too happy to connect the fall of the Berlin Wall to Ronald Reagan because he was quite a conservative president, he said. He made the Cold War much more intense than it was before.
(Excerpt) Read more at dw.com ...
Germany already declared war on the USA in 1941. If they had assimilated the power of the USSR into their own (and frankly, Stalin’s ideology was more national socialist than international socialist), it would have been a hot war.
Thanks for the ping.
I had seen a thread, and in it a FReeper pointed out that the statue, since it’s on embassy grounds, is technically not in Berlin.
But facts won’t stop the media from pushing their agenda.
Nazism did not contain within it the seeds of its own destruction like communism did. They would have been a stronger and thus worse enemy than the Commies were.
Looks great. Thanks for the ping.
I believe in Mine Kampf Hitler even predicted the cold war being divided into three “zones of influence” with the USA controlling North and South America, Japan controlling East Asia and Germany controlling Europe and Russia west of the Urals). We’ll never know but my contention the cold war would have been about the same just substitute Germany and the Reich for the USSR and the East Block. One side note The Reich would have made it to the moon first, those bastards.
Like history records, Hitler insisted on a hot war with the USA, no matter what he had said in his earlier writings (he also originally said that he merely wanted Jews out of Germany IIRC). And if he had held onto the nuclear scientists we got out of Germany, we could have seen an atomic holocaust too.
He wins Barbarossa, peace with the UK and let the cold war begin.....PS: The Krauts were a decade away from a ‘bomb’ in ‘42.
A win of Barbarossa would have resulted in a redoubled hot war on the Axis’ western flank since that meant the eastern front was secured. Neither Hitler nor Churchill (already at war for two years prior) would have sued for peace in such an eventuality. Wins emboldened Hitler rather than made him settle for any sort of “cold war” situation.
The Allies were in fact convinced that Nazi Germany could have achieved atomic breakout before the war actually ended, particularly due to the fact that it was in 1938 that German scientists discovered how to induce nuclear fission (hence missions like Operation Big). Should Hitler have secured the whole continent, he would have had the time to produce atomic weapons far more rapidly, and he would have used them.
In Mein Kampf Hitler conceded the the British Empire was no threat to the Reich in the sense the part of the world controlled by British imperialism were not on the Reich's radar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.