Posted on 11/04/2019 3:34:13 PM PST by Olog-hai
If one cannot call his own homosexual urges a disease, he/she cannot by extension call it a problem or a disorder. In other words, one cannot complain about it even if it is a trait they have that they do not like or consider problematic OR a trait they would just prefer to change.
Just like any cult or the Roach Hotel. You can come in...but you can't get out.
That Satan fellow is slick as extra virgin olive oil...or freshly spilt blood.
Hi.
German Health Minister Jens Spahn is blowing smoke.
5.56mm
So odd. Muslims taking over and they are pushing fags. Somethings going to topple.
Being physically male or female is not a disease either. What will they say to “transgenders”?
It is not a disease, it is a BEHAVIOUR. And behaviors can be modified according to my Mom........................
Even if so, why shouldn’t people be free to seek therapy to change if they want?
It’s environmental, caused by birth control hormones in the water supply.
The major one is imprinting...........................
No, it is NOT a disease. Neither are addictions diseases. However, both can benefit from therapy.
Being a boy, or a girl, is not a disease, and requires no therapy to treat.
Discomfort with one’s sex is sufficient grounds to bring in the all forces of modern progressive medicine to “change” that sex, and the forces of law and society to make others accede to that change.
But discomfort with one’s attractions does not permit a bit of talk therapy, to see if those attractions could shift.
Homosexuality is not a disease, but most homosexuals have STDs. Homosexuality is a learn behavior triggered by mental illness.
At the very least homosexuality between men is a perversion of nature. Women are naturally feminine so they are half way there already. It’s not that much of a leap for women but for men, well, I can’t see how two men could possibly be attracted to each other and do what they do in bed. It’s unnatural in my humble opinion.
Maybe this is why women are so much more accepting of homosexuality. Maybe this is also why they so easily accept a man can become a woman (Trans). I think both deserve a non-biased study. This isn’t just about being a liberal or conservative. This is about nature and the word of God. To accept homosexuality means God screwed up. I put up with it, not that I have a choice, but never accepted it as “normal”. It’s a choice to be that kind of perverted.
Technically it’s a perversion.
Female homosexuality is just as unnatural and they come by it like the males do.
My conservative mother would never tolerate lesbianism any more than male sodomy.
It’s a SIN!!!
If we are to use the Biblical term, it’s an abomination (from Hebrew to’ebah).
I think Randle Patrick “Mac” McMurphy knows a thing or two about getting your brain right.
But there is also no gay gene. It is optional.
I am curious, when precisely did it not become a disease?
It used to be. Is there some paper or thesis that establishes the change in prognosis or was a magic wand waved and different terminology arbitrarily applied?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.