Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Manly Warrior

“The dead man was known to be armed, investigation for murder the day previously, shot at cops, killed already, fleeing from arrest on felony murder. Not sure where the disconnect is for you.”

I give the police a lot of leeway, but the kid was unarmed as it turned out, had his ballcap in his right hand (it fell off when he hopped the fence). He was wanted for questioning not fleeing arrest for murder or escaping a crime scene, he had not shot at cops. His brother apparently shot the car the previous day that led to a fatal wreck. Many people who have had run ins with law panic and run. I’m sure he knew what they wanted with him.

Maybe he was a bad kid. Maybe the shot was legal by law. I just feel the shooting was an overreach. I admit I don’t know all the facts. I’m not gonna call it murder or anything but I’d like to see a bit more restraint absent an obvious direct threat.


73 posted on 10/24/2019 10:41:51 PM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Zack Attack

His brother apparently shot the car the previous day that led to a fatal wreck.


No, they intentionally opened fire on a vehicle and someone died as a result. That is first-degree murder. It doesn’t matter that his brother was the one who actually fired the gun. Under the felony murder rule he is just as guilty. They would both get the death penalty.


75 posted on 10/24/2019 10:58:06 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson