Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK
I did, but from the top again:

-There is no Article 1, Section 8 right conferred to the govt to engage in transportation or exploration

-Technically, NASA grew out of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), which was established as an emergency measure during World War I to promote industry, academic, and government coordination on war-related projects. I guess that's Constitutional.

- NASA's remit wasn't tied to military endeavors, thus breaking whatever Constitutional linkage to NACA that NASA may have had. Thanks for listening.

78 posted on 10/25/2019 8:05:56 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleBob
Yes, but I think you are conferring a meaning from between the lines. The Constitution does encourage funding scientific endeavors and "promoting the general welfare". The space program clearly does both.

I thank God daily that people like you have no traction in our governance.

79 posted on 10/26/2019 6:16:39 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson