Posted on 10/23/2019 7:50:56 PM PDT by Morgana
A new documentary about U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas suggests his conservative stance on abortion may have been behind the efforts to stop his confirmation.
Time reports the documentary, Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, largely is based on a recent interview with the conservative justice. In it, he speaks about his faith, his philosophy, politics, race and his early life of poverty.
Thomas also talked about his contentious confirmation hearing before the U.S. Senate in 1991 and Democratic lawmakers focus on abortion.
Most of my opponents on the Judiciary Committee cared about only one thing: how would I rule on abortion rights? Thomas remembered. You really didnt matter, and your life didnt matter. What mattered was what they wanted. And what they wanted was this particular issue.
Heres more from the report:
This is the wrong black guy, he has to be destroyed, Thomas says at one point in the film, characterizing those who opposed his nomination to the Supreme Court nomination in 1991. Just say it. And now at least were honest with each other. Remembering the moment that Anita Hills allegations that he had sexually harassed her were made public, Thomas says, thats when all heck broke loose.
It was after the first round of hearings during which Democratic senators pressed him on his judicial philosophy and abortion that Hill testified that Thomas had sexually harassed her at work. Thomas unequivocally denied each of her allegations thenand he does so again in the documentary.
In the film, he recalls feeling deflated when the FBI first came to his house and asked him about Hills allegations, and describes the ensuing media onslaught as him being literally under siege. Oh God, no, Thomas says when Pack asks him whether he watched Hills testimony.
The idea was to get rid of me, he continued. And then after I was there, it was to undermine me.
LifeNews depends on the support of readers like you to combat the pro-abortion media. Please donate now.
Thomas has been a strong supporter of human rights for unborn babies on the court. In May, he wrote an opinion urging the court to consider laws that protect unborn babies from eugenics after the court refused to hear an Indiana case involving a ban on discriminatory abortions on babies with Down syndrome.
this law and other laws like it promote a States compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics, he wrote. Although the Court declines to wade into these issues today, we cannot avoid them forever. Having created the constitutional right to an abortion, this Court is dutybound to address its scope.
The documentary is slated to air in May on PBS.
Pro-life advocates suspect, very similarly, that abortion politics were behind the efforts to derail Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaughs confirmation last year after several women came forward to accuse him of sexual misconduct.
In September, a lawyer for accuser Christine Blasey Ford admitted that part of their motivation was to keep abortion on demand legal.
He will always have an asterisk next to his name, lawyer Debra Katz told a feminist conference at the University of Baltimore. When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him, and that is important; it is important that we know, and that is part of what motivated Christine.
The U.S. Supreme Court currently has a five-four conservative majority. Pro-life advocates hope the justices will consider restoring protections to unborn babies or at least limiting the scope of Roe v. Wade, which forces states to legalize abortions up to viability.
Same abortion that is why they hate Trump. satan is so ever present.
He is exactly right.
Pubic hair on the coca-cola can shall live on in infamy forever.
Kavanaugh redux
You forgot long dong silver
I watched Thomas’ confirmation hearing, and it truly was a high-tech lynching attempted—not unsurprisingly—by the DEMONrat party.
And it has so sickened me to hear Biden pander to the “me too” movement by apologizing for how he treated Anita Hill.
I heard heard her testimony during the confirmation hearing, and was convinced she was flat out lying, because she said she wanted to follow Thomas to his new job.
I was certain, having had experience in representing women who were actually victims of sexual harassment, that there was no way in hell a woman who had been harassed by a man would be willing to follow him to a new job!
Justice Thomas is correct of course. Abortion legality should be a local decision. Many of us want to live in an area where human life is protected at all stages.
Its one reason, but there are so many more they had besides this one.
Seifman later showed up as an "adviser" to Christine Blasey Ford.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.