Posted on 10/22/2019 1:55:41 PM PDT by mikelets456
That’s just Dallas. Dallas is for metrosexuals and liberals.
Real men wearing boots are rarely found on that end of the Metroplex.
And in not so old Texas, as recently as the early 70s, the dad would have shot down the judge and mom and been acquitted. It’s more of a crapshoot today...
A jury no less. That actually surprised me most. I’d say there’s a ton we don’t know. The jury had to be very shocked about something to end up with this verdict. I wish we had full story.
At seven years old, a child does not realize what sex means and what it means to try to change sexes. Anybody who goes along with allowing a seven year old to be mutilated and given hormones is a troubled soul and should be held for child abuse. People cannot change genders, no matter how hard they try. To do this to a child is a sin. This mother is ruining a child’s entire life.
This is child abuse, sanctioned by the State.
This item has a few more details plus a PETITION. Scroll down to sign.
Judge Kim Cooks can get phone messages at (214) 653-6159
The mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, is a pediatrician— !!
Reviews at her website seem to be experiencing heavy troll traffic.
Her defenders claim she “only” wanted her son to see a transgender-sympathetic therapist, but that the “religious zealots” are “falsely claiming she wants her son’s balls chopped off.”
(But the alphabet people have been issuing similar disclaimers forever. They’re no threat to children, Christian’s have sick fantasies, yada yada.)
But the court decision goes far beyond that, indicating the father— isn’t making it up.
Great idea. File appeal and set up go fund me page.
This wasn’t just a rogue judge. A jury made a verdict where 11 of 12 agreed.
Juries can be stacked ESPECIALLY in a case like this.
ANY indication that potential jurors might regard sex as an immutable biological fact, or that “transgender” ideology directed at children might be, at best, inappropriate, or, at worst, might constitute child abuse in service of a political agenda -— would have gotten them booted for bias.
To be on this jury, jurors would have been REQUIRED to put aside any previously held Biblical teaching AND any scientific reliance on chromosomes.
See my post #28.
Yep! I don’t think some read that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.