Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury Rules Against Father Protecting 7-Year Old Son from Forced ‘Transitioning’
LWC ^ | 10/22/2019 | LWC

Posted on 10/22/2019 1:55:41 PM PDT by mikelets456

n 2019, it should not be a controversial opinion to say that a seven-year-old boy shouldn’t be forced into transitioning into a girl. It shouldn’t be, yet we all find ourselves right here (see Transgenders ‘Detransitioning’ on the Rise. And the LGBTQ Community Isn’t Helping. and Father Shares Heartbreaking Story of Son Who’s ‘Transitioning.’ And He’s Powerless to Stop It.). A jury just ruled against a father trying to stop his son’s mother from turning the boy into “Luna.” Oh, so this is happening in the United Kingdom? No. Oh so this is happening in Canada, Justin Trudeau’s land of milk and black face paint? No. This case is unfolding in Dallas, Texas. Texas, the supposed conservative bastion of rights, lower taxes, and all things ‘Murica. So, you know. Let that sink in for a second.

With a consensus of 11 of the 12 jurors, the jury decided not to grant Mr. Younger Sole Managing Conservatorship over his two twin boys.

(Excerpt) Read more at louderwithcrowder.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: father; gender; postedseveraltimes; reassignment; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: mikelets456

That’s just Dallas. Dallas is for metrosexuals and liberals.

Real men wearing boots are rarely found on that end of the Metroplex.

And in not so old Texas, as recently as the early 70s, the dad would have shot down the judge and mom and been acquitted. It’s more of a crapshoot today...


21 posted on 10/22/2019 3:44:32 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

A jury no less. That actually surprised me most. I’d say there’s a ton we don’t know. The jury had to be very shocked about something to end up with this verdict. I wish we had full story.


22 posted on 10/22/2019 4:09:41 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

At seven years old, a child does not realize what sex means and what it means to try to change sexes. Anybody who goes along with allowing a seven year old to be mutilated and given hormones is a troubled soul and should be held for child abuse. People cannot change genders, no matter how hard they try. To do this to a child is a sin. This mother is ruining a child’s entire life.


23 posted on 10/22/2019 4:10:41 PM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

This is child abuse, sanctioned by the State.


24 posted on 10/22/2019 5:04:49 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456; All

This item has a few more details plus a PETITION. Scroll down to sign.

https://lifepetitions.com/petition/i-support-the-father-of-6-year-old-boy-being-forced-to-live-as-a-girl

Judge Kim Cooks can get phone messages at (214) 653-6159

The mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, is a pediatrician— !!
Reviews at her website seem to be experiencing heavy troll traffic.

Her defenders claim she “only” wanted her son to see a transgender-sympathetic therapist, but that the “religious zealots” are “falsely claiming she wants her son’s balls chopped off.”
(But the alphabet people have been issuing similar disclaimers forever. They’re no threat to children, Christian’s have sick fantasies, yada yada.)

But the court decision goes far beyond that, indicating the father— isn’t making it up.


25 posted on 10/22/2019 8:11:39 PM PDT by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

Great idea. File appeal and set up go fund me page.


26 posted on 10/23/2019 5:37:41 AM PDT by alamogal (Give em Hell Donald!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mumblypeg

This wasn’t just a rogue judge. A jury made a verdict where 11 of 12 agreed.


27 posted on 10/23/2019 5:57:55 AM PDT by david1292
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: david1292

Juries can be stacked ESPECIALLY in a case like this.

ANY indication that potential jurors might regard sex as an immutable biological fact, or that “transgender” ideology directed at children might be, at best, inappropriate, or, at worst, might constitute child abuse in service of a political agenda -— would have gotten them booted for bias.

To be on this jury, jurors would have been REQUIRED to put aside any previously held Biblical teaching AND any scientific reliance on chromosomes.


28 posted on 10/23/2019 4:50:11 PM PDT by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

See my post #28.


29 posted on 10/23/2019 4:53:39 PM PDT by mumblypeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Yep! I don’t think some read that.


30 posted on 10/23/2019 5:04:21 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson