[greeneyes]

1. The “Senior Executive Service” (aka “SES”) is at the festering, rotten core of the Deep State.

2. Didn’t you see the graphic in my #300?
(Do an image search for “Keystone Drawing”...)

3. When you remove the Keystone, what happens to the arch and all that it supports??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4. SES = Keystone — to dismantling the Deep State?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Apologies for “lapsing back into comms mode” — in anticipation..

*************************************************************************************
Ok, replying to your comments by number:

!. Yes it is the core. I thought we had established that months ago.

2. Yes I saw your graphic. It looks like the graphics I have seen before months ago.

3. Yes, the arch falls and all that it supports - we established this months ago.

4. Yes, it is key-SES must go to git rid of DS.

So I still don’t understand - Your post 300:

SES Union Symbol, FReeQs?
Keystone, anyone?

*******************************************************************************************
What is your question???

All this was discussed and acknowledged already months ago - Are you disputing it?

Did you want someone else to dispute it?

If just a reminder, why end with question marks?

Like I said, I was not sure what you were trying to communicate, so I asked for an explanation. Which is still unanswered—but never mind.

I apologize for trying to figure out what you were doing.

I wish I’d just ignored it instead of trying to discuss it. (sigh) I’ll try to do better.

[TXnMA]

If this little misunderstanding hadn't wasted so much of our time, it would be funny!

There were three confusion factors involved:

1. "SES Union Symbol, FReeQs?" is Cletus D. Yokel's (#192) line -- not mine.

2. (For once, I didn't follow my decades-old (ca 1989) <I>"QUOTATION"</I> format convention for citing a quoted item.)

3. You assumed that I had been on-thread for a prior discussion of the SES. I had not been, and was unaware of it..

(If you wish, you might do well to re-evaluate my #300 in light of the above...)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. I  apologize for not adhering to my own decades-old (ca 1979) online format for citing quotations.

2. I feel no need to apologize for spending much of my time off-Qthread, doing exhaustive OHI (OverHeadImagery) intel work on Epstein's islands & ranch properties, etc...

3. I feel no need to apologize for having independently corroborated a conclusion reached earlier by the group.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Perhaps we both should be more cognizant of our group's "attitude motto":

Where We Go One We Go All!

FRreQgards,
TXnMA