Posted on 10/13/2019 4:27:23 PM PDT by simpson96
Edited on 10/14/2019 9:14:20 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Hillary Clinton defended Meghan Markle in a new interview, saying her biracial background
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
Oh, good grief.
FReepers have been as hard on her as anyone on the internet, and I can’t recall anyone here making a fuss or even mentioning about her ethnicity
Being an entitled whore, yes.
They treated her worse than a black dude with tits, or was horrible.
Everybody is a victim.
Shame on everybody? Youre not God, you frigging, dried up bitch. Die already!
Constant victims, those 2....really are shining examples of strong women. /S
I do want to say that the way shes been treated is inexplicable, the former Secretary of State told The Sunday Times of London in an interview.
If the explanation is that shes biracial, then shame on everybody, Clinton said...
If it was inexplicable wouldn’t there be no explanation???
Bill Clinton was from Arkansas. He had racial hate in all he did in Little Rock. His Governor’s mansion was staffed by all blacks for low jobs. I saw it.
Amen to that!!!!
LOL!
Respect from one grifter to another.
OK, so you "broke the mold". So what. That makes you so "special"? Kind of like breaking a Ming vase?
She who knows everything must express an opinion. Vile, odious.
Meghan Markle is targeted because she believes she is entitled.....what she is is an entitled biotch.
Is there anything Hillary Clinton is not an expert on? Just curious.
[Blind Gossip] We’re here to serve up some homemade controversy!
The sudden flurry of legal activity around this actress and her husband seems poorly timed, doesn’t it?
After all, the events they are supposedly upset about happened over a year ago, and there was no outcry then.
In addition, the couple was just coming off a round of badly-need good publicity. Why create headlines that immediately took away from that? That is completely illogical.
Well, we might have the answer!
Yes, it was poorly timed, but their hand was forced. They needed a distraction to get ahead of the photos and video. They wanted to scare off the media so they would hesitate or decline to run the new story.
What are these photos and video?
It’s her. Allegedly, allegedly, allegedly. Sans clothing.
The photos show multiple occasions where a woman who looks like her has “her girls” out. Some look like they were taken by invasive paparazzi with a long lens. Others look more purposeful, as if they were taken by her or someone with her. Some have been published before. Some are new. If published, the photos would certainly create controversy.
The video is of a woman engaged in very explicit, consensual relations with a man. The woman strongly resembles her. However, much of the time her face is contorted in… umm… excitement. Thus, an exact match is challenging. We don’t recognize the man. It’s a homemade video, not a studio production. The camera was obviously set up by the couple and she faces the camera much of the time.
We honestly don’t know if it’s her. It looks like her… but it could be a doppelganger.
So, there you go. If you were wondering why their legal announcements were so out of the blue and so poorly timed, this might be the reason.
Risque selfies and homemade videos and legal action… they’re as American as apple pie!
Similar: Secret Video Of A Movie Star
Couple:
[Optional] What do you think is the real reason behind their legal actions?
The Royals have never had over the top tabloid coverage until Merkle. Sure thing.
Hillary is so stupid.
Liberals invent reasons to be victims.
Is there anything Hillary Clinton is not an expert on? Just curious.The male anatomy?
No, Hillary-it isn’t because of her racial makeup-it is because she is a clueless attention whore and gold digger-and she’s dumber than a box of rocks...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.