Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Executive Order on Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents
whitehouse.gov ^ | 10/8/19 | President Donald Trump

Posted on 10/09/2019 3:25:41 PM PDT by ransomnote

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure that Americans are subject to only those binding rules imposed through duly enacted statutes or through regulations lawfully promulgated under them, and that Americans have fair notice of their obligations, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Policy.  Departments and agencies (agencies) in the executive branch adopt regulations that impose legally binding requirements on the public even though, in our constitutional democracy, only Congress is vested with the legislative power.  The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires agencies, in exercising that solemn responsibility, to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking to provide public notice of proposed regulations under section 553 of title 5, United States Code, allow interested parties an opportunity to comment, consider and respond to significant comments, and publish final regulations in the Federal Register.

Agencies may clarify existing obligations through non binding guidance documents, which the APA exempts from notice-and-comment requirements.  Yet agencies have sometimes used this authority inappropriately in attempts to regulate the public without following the rulemaking procedures of the APA.  Even when accompanied by a disclaimer that it is non-binding, a guidance document issued by an agency may carry the implicit threat of enforcement action if the regulated public does not comply.  Moreover, the public frequently has insufficient notice of guidance documents, which are not always published in the Federal Register or distributed to all regulated parties.

Americans deserve an open and fair regulatory process that imposes new obligations on the public only when consistent with applicable law and after an agency follows appropriate procedures.  Therefore, it is the policy of the executive branch, to the extent consistent with applicable law, to require that agencies treat guidance documents as non-binding both in law and in practice, except as incorporated into a contract, take public input into account when appropriate in formulating guidance documents, and make guidance documents readily available to the public.  Agencies may impose legally binding requirements on the public only through regulations and on parties on a case-by-case basis through adjudications, and only after appropriate process, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract.

Sec2.  Definitions.  For the purposes of this order:

(a)  “Agency” has the meaning given in section 3(b) of Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), as amended.

(b)  “Guidance document” means an agency statement of general applicability, intended to have future effect on the behavior of regulated parties, that sets forth a policy on a statutory, regulatory, or technical issue, or an interpretation of a statute or regulation, but does not include the following:

(i)    rules promulgated pursuant to notice and comment under section 553 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions;

(ii)   rules exempt from rulemaking requirements under section 553(a) of title 5, United States Code;

(iii)  rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice;

(iv)   decisions of agency adjudications under section 554 of title 5, United States Code, or similar statutory provisions;



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bureaucrats; eo; executiveorder; law

1 posted on 10/09/2019 3:25:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

And written in a manner a layman can understand!


2 posted on 10/09/2019 3:31:45 PM PDT by phs3 (MAGA - Winning a little more every day!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I’m at work and don’t have time to read this yet. But, is there anything here that reads something close to the reinstatement of the second amendment in full?


3 posted on 10/09/2019 3:35:15 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Fact: Gun control laws kill innocents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Wow, need to read this all the way through but after the first couple of paragraphs I can already hear the wails of the deep state bureaucrats.


4 posted on 10/09/2019 3:36:11 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phs3

Very wide-ranging.

“EPA”, kiss my ass; I’ll build my retention pond and you can go F/O.


5 posted on 10/09/2019 3:43:23 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

After one reading, I can see where this would apply to property rights and how a person uses his property.

It is very wide-ranging. The EPA and Department of Interior socialists will be greatly affected.


6 posted on 10/09/2019 3:46:41 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Bkmrk


7 posted on 10/09/2019 7:26:41 PM PDT by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson