Whoopsie.
1 posted on
10/07/2019 8:51:26 AM PDT by
dayglored
To: Abby4116; afraidfortherepublic; aft_lizard; AF_Blue; AppyPappy; arnoldc1; ATOMIC_PUNK; bajabaja; ...
2 posted on
10/07/2019 8:54:28 AM PDT by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government."`)
To: dayglored
Not just VMWare but Oracle VirtualBox too.
This hurts my business. Also prevents linux, ubuntu and others, I think.
3 posted on
10/07/2019 9:00:59 AM PDT by
FroggyTheGremlim
( The following statement is false. The previous statement is true.)
To: dayglored
“In a thread on Microsoft’s site, one affected user complained that upgrading their 100 VMware Workstation licences would cost 11,500.”
Makes one wonder if MS has any vested interest in this end result? This kind of reminds me of the McCafee fiasco when they were installing their own viruses and then charging to fix them.
Could it be rigged rather than an accident? I would not put this past MS to do on purpose.
To: dayglored
This is not a sound strategy, since it is a system component and tinkering with it could have unpredictable affects on other applications or system stability. In addition, relaxing permissions on sysmain.sdb could make it a security vulnerability. Classic case of "Don't do as we do - do as we say" if I ever saw one...
11 posted on
10/07/2019 10:00:26 AM PDT by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: dayglored
MS has warned against keeping old VMs. At my Job I held on as long as allowed.
25 posted on
10/07/2019 11:08:42 AM PDT by
Harpotoo
(Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
To: dayglored
To be fair VMWare workstation pro is up to version 15.5.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson