[CollegeRepublican]

The use of vulgarity and colloquialisms does not reflect well on this news site. If they want to be taken seriously, and the content may be true, it does not come across as reliable.

[InterceptPoint]

The use of vulgarity and colloquialisms does not reflect well on this news site. If they want to be taken seriously, and the content may be true, it does not come across as reliable.
+++++
I am witness #1 for your proposition. I wouldn’t waste my time reading their stuff.

[wastoute]

Are you sleepy as well?

[Jacquerie]

Agree. There’s no need to emulate the foul mouths on the Left.

There’s probably good info in the column but I stopped reading after the first sentence.

[Real Cynic No More]

Ibid!

[cymbeline]

“The use of vulgarity and colloquialisms...”

Totally agree. Trump gets bashed for a little saltiness but the entertainment media (news media falls in that category) is saturated with profanity throw in dishonesty and stupidity.

[philman_36]

The use of vulgarity and colloquialisms does not reflect well on this news site.

Perhaps you should read their "About Us" page...
About

We here at The National Sentinel are not about to sit back and just watch this s*|t unfold while doing nothing to help expose it.
Our method is in-your-face conservatism. Big balls conservatism. ‘*uck you’ conservatism. We don’t have time to be polite anymore. And we’re not going to be.
So if this kind of approach offends your sensibilities, okay. Maybe you shouldn’t be here. We’re not going to change because, again, we don’t have time to be polite to these deep state p*|cks.

You don't have to read the threads or visit the website.

If they want to be taken seriously, and the content may be true, it does not come across as reliable.
What "may be" false in their reporting? It's either true or it isn't.

You put more credit with how something "appears" than how it is.
Got it.
Isnt that the same thing the MSM does?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

I totally agree thanks for pointing it out.