Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote; mairdie

"Jim Rob has specifically prohibited the posting of conspiracy content re 9/11, UFO’s etc. on Free Republic. In this case, I think if the mod deleted the link, best not to repost it. :)"


"...and then I was in the middle of stuff that made me feel dirty..."   (see post #916)


Holy mudpuddles!!!   As far as I know, none of my posts ever made someone feel dirty before, (except that time I posted to Joe-30330-BR549, and told him to keep his dirty paws off all those women and girls).   That made Joe feel really dirty, because Joe IS really dirty!        :-)

A couple quick clarifications:

  1. It wasn't a "link" that was deleted in that person's original post, ransomnote, but. rather, it was the entire thread, and I thought it had been deleted because the whole article was posted in the thread, and I know that is generally frowned upon here, due to copyright issues.

  2. The reason I posted the link to that article here, was NOT because of the very brief mention in the article of "9/11", or to advance any "conspiracy theories".   The main thrust and essential theme of that article I linked to, was, to me, a plausible-sounding explanation of why Romney blasted Trump about that phone call with Ukraine, before he was even able to be made aware of that call's actual contents, and now seems so hot to pursue impeachment with the demonrats, and I wanted to share that article, which someone else had posted first in another FR thread, with everyone here in the Q thread, after I saw a post where a poster here in this Q thread was actually looking for the link to that same article.   As I see it, that article could not possibly be honestly and accurately characterized as a "9/11 conspiracy article".   The brief reference in the article to 9/11 was mainly just to show the connections that Romney has had in the past, with Ukraine, Cofer Black, John Brennan, and the rest of the "Six-Ways-From-Sunday" gang.

In recent days, others here on FR have already pointed out many of these connections in various posts, and that article was simply tying together those various historical facts, in order to show why Romney jumped in so fast like a slithering demonrat, in response to that innocuous Trump phone call.   However, be that as it may, we really don't need that "controversial" article to spell it all out for us.   We know the following facts about some of those connections, indicating where some of these shady characters crossed paths, and where their careers intersected/overlapped in the past.


Just the other day, FOX's Tucker Carlson broadcast the following intriguing segment, which included outlining the many failures of our intelligence community in recent years.   (WARNING:   Tucker mentions - in passing - "9/11"!)


     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=by4MzrVODeQ - "Tucker: Trump refused to bow to intelligence agencies".


(And, mairdie, I truly am sorry that the article I linked to caused you to feel dirty.   I hope and trust that since my post with that link has now been deleted, you are feeling fine, and clean as a whistle now!)        :-)

1,295 posted on 10/06/2019 7:14:37 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 908 | View Replies ]


To: Songcraft

SNIP

A couple quick clarifications:

1. It wasn’t a “link” that was deleted in that person’s original post, ransomnote, but. rather, it was the entire thread, and I thought it had been deleted because the whole article was posted in the thread, and I know that is generally frowned upon here, due to copyright issues.

2. The reason I posted the link to that article here, was NOT because of the very brief mention in the article of “9/11”, or to advance any “conspiracy theories”. The main thrust and essential theme of that article I linked to, was, to me, a plausible-sounding explanation of why Romney blasted Trump about that phone call with Ukraine, before he was even able to be made aware of that call’s actual contents, and now seems so hot to pursue impeachment with the demonrats, and I wanted to share that article, which someone else had posted first in another FR thread, with everyone here in the Q thread, after I saw a post where a poster here in this Q thread was actually looking for the link to that same article. As I see it, that article could not possibly be honestly and accurately characterized as a “9/11 conspiracy article”. The brief reference in the article to 9/11 was mainly just to show the connections that Romney has had in the past, with Ukraine, Cofer Black, John Brennan, and the rest of the “Six-Ways-From-Sunday” gang.

SNIP
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ThankQ for the clarification, Song-craft. :)


1,299 posted on 10/06/2019 7:39:25 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1295 | View Replies ]

To: Songcraft

I agree with everything you said. I wish the MODS would explain why they do what they do with something more than, “Crap” which was why they pulled the OP on the main board.
Having said that, It’s JR’s shop so I will stand down.
Thanks for your effort. Carry on.


1,344 posted on 10/07/2019 12:08:17 AM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1295 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson