Did OAN provide documentation that Haspel would have had to approve the change in the form? AND that she actually did? Because derps break the rules all the time. Maybe she is supposed to authorize such a change, but maybe she did not. Until proven she did, is still ...TBD.
And maybe she did to enable this Charlie Foxtrot. It has had the desired effect. The Killer Librarian strikes again.
“Did OAN provide documentation that Haspel would have had to approve the change in the form? AND that she actually did?”
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/post#help
It could have been submitted to her as part of an omnibus change, one change in a small ream contining changes for which she relied on the review and approval of those under her. (Or, it did not require her approval at all and someone working for her would be responsible for form changes, generally low level sort of managerial committee stuff.)