We'll see, hopefully, whether "use of force" for treason and sedition charges include the use of intelligence and counter-intelligence assets of the USA, allies, and non-allies to attempt an overthrow of the US government.
I would say YES, just as much as the "use of force" of aircraft, ships, missiles, submarines, or small arms.
Add in the fact that all the civilian agencies, the judiciary, and half or more of the legislative branch were also weaponized against this administration and against the people of the USA, and the "use of force" becomes a very strong argument.
That right there means plenty of them were guilty of sedition. Advocating, and then next planning, and then doing.
I would say YES, just as much as the "use of force" of aircraft, ships, missiles, submarines, or small arms.
Add in the fact that all the civilian agencies, the judiciary, and half or more of the legislative branch were also weaponized against this administration and against the people of the USA, and the "use of force" becomes a very strong argument.
You bring up a good point and that made me think if "use of force" would include, if it were ever revealed, the missile fired at AF1 to try to take out our President. If that was eventually revealed, along with all the coup plotters behind it, I would think that might apply to "use of force".
CGato