Other than Pravda on the Hudson and the Guardian having near duplicate reporting themes, I don’t get the point.
When it comes to death and “reporting” on deaths in the news, of course homicide - which is less common than cancer - is reported in the news more often. Is there an identifiable person who is a culprit in a cancer death?? What would be the purpose of reporting every cancer death the way homicides are reported?
I don’t get the point.
More of an observation that "man bites dog" gets the coverage.
Then coverage drives policy.