See my immediate prior post. The Supreme Court has refused cert on cases like this so far.
Such was 2.5 years ago in a head on collision.
The fact found that both drivers were texting.
A young mother & child were killed in each vehicle.
You said the Supreme Court has ruled that police can search your phone without a warrant. Then you link to a wired article and tell me the Supreme Court has refused to hear these cases.
The case that wired is referring to has nothing to do with searching a phone without a warrant. Law enforcement HAD a warrant in that case. The issue is whether they could unlock the phone with Face ID WITH a warrant.
The issue isn’t the 4th Amendment (police DO need a warrant or exigency to search a phone) but rather the 5th Amendment. Your face isn’t protected by the 5th Amendment.