Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Magnum44

Well trespassing is one thing. However, people can and do get shot for trespassing. Whether the shoot is legal or not doesn’t matter a whole lot to the person with the bullet in them, so that should be considered.

But if they are inside, where I am, that is a totally different beast.

I am not even going to talk to them. It’s just going to be violence as quickly as I can.


216 posted on 08/29/2019 2:44:28 PM PDT by chris37 (Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]


To: chris37

Again, same page.


219 posted on 08/29/2019 2:46:52 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

To: chris37

Again I say you had better read up on the laws in your state.

In most states, the law is that you have a reason to believe your life is in danger if you are in the house while it is being broken into.

The logic is that you have no way of knowing whether your door is being breached to get at your valuables or to get at you.

On the other hand, if you arrive at your house while a burglary is in progress, you can not shoot unless the bad guy is armed and a definite threat to your safety and you were unaware that he was in your house.

The logic being that he did not break in to hurt you, but rather to steal your stuff knowing you were not home.

That is based on the philosophy that no matter how much your stuff is worth, maybe even hundreds of thousands, the life of the most unworthy human scum is worth more.

The law is especially hard on those who could see from the street that something was amiss, a strange car in the driveway, the door standing open, a broken window, etc., and did not withdraw to a safe distance and call the cops.

Entering your house knowing a burglary is in progress is very bad judgement both from a legal standpoint and from the standpoint of personal safety.

Arguing whether the laws are just will not save your butt in court. The prosecution will only use your opinion against you to show you care not what the laws are.

As for the castle doctrine, so often quoted by those who have no idea what they are talking about, it does not negate any of the requirements for a lawful self defense shoot. In reality, all it does is eliminate the requirement that you attempt to flee plus it protects the lawful shooter from civil lawsuits. And it defines those places where it can be claimed.

I am not a lawyer. Just someone who carries and realizes how treacherous self defense laws are.


279 posted on 08/29/2019 6:03:33 PM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson