[ClearCase_guy]

What would be the point?

[Black Agnes]

At this point, what difference would it make?

[lee martell]

Agreed. If Atty Gen.is going to find some way not to prosecute Hilary, or even indict her (as with Comey), then
‘what difference @ this point does it make?’
We are long past the time where empty gestures and theater could suffice for direct action.

[DannyTN]

If there are smoking guns in there of bribery of government officials, Trump could invalidated the deal and take the mines back.

[Liz]

Obama Admin. Misled About Uranium One
TruNews ^ | Dec 12, 2017 | Rick Wiles / FR Posted

In a letter to Energy Secretary Rick Perry and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairwoman Kristine Svinicki, Senate Environment & Public Works Committee Chairman John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) is demanding an explanation for how U.S. uranium left the country after the Uranium One deal.

The senator, who represents the home state of three of the company’s uranium recovery facilities, said he registered “strong concerns” about the 2010 deal with President Barack Obama. He said he now believes the response he received, and the “process” through which he received it, were “misleading.”

He notes that in March of 2011, then-NRC Chairman Greg Jaczko said that neither Uranium One nor the subsidiary of the Russian-government-owner Rosatom held the necessary export license to ship U.S. uranium out of the country. That assessment was repeated in the NRC’s recommendation to approve the Uranium One sale. However, beginning in 2012, Uranium One was able to begin exporting uranium without an export license in a move called “piggy-backing,” where it was listed merely as a supplier on another company’s export license. However, that uranium that left the country was supposed to return for “future processing.”

Not only did that uranium leave the U.S., but it was eventually exported out of Canada (the place that domiciles a branch of the Clinton Foundation). (Excerpt) Read more at trunews.com ...

[sarge83]

Trump needs to declassify all this crap and see what happens. Right now the deep state has shown they are in control. I suspect they would disobey the order to declassify and why wouldn’t they?

Up to this point the deep state has:

Rigged the 2016 election and still lost.

Tried a coup on a duly elected president and failed.

Covered up their election tampering and coup attempt.

Then got CAUGHT! Damning evidence in all cases and the results, not one single deep state goon prosecuted. So my question is why would they fear anything where the law is concerned—THEY ARE THE LAW.

Trump will lose the 2020 election, because the deep state will simply commit fraud on a massive scale and why not, even if caught there will be no consequences. 2016 will be the last relatively free election where the people chose their leader.

[rxsid]

"What would be the point?"

For starters, transparency.