Posted on 08/28/2019 10:26:53 PM PDT by Morgana
Last fall, speaking to a far-right Austrian magazine, the Iowa Republican congressman Steve King succinctly laid out his theory of Western decline. The problem, he suggested, was a demographic born at the nexus of reproduction and immigration. “If we continue to abort our babies and import a replacement for them in the form of young violent men, we are supplanting our culture, our civilization,” King said.
King had already called attention to himself the previous year for retweeting a cartoon that depicted the nativist Dutch party leader Geert Wilders as a bulwark against invading Muslim hordes. “Wilders understands that culture and demographics are our destiny. We can’t restore our civilization with somebody else’s babies,” King wrote.
This month, King was back in the headlines. Speaking to a conservative group outside Des Moines about his support for a total ban on abortion, he asked: “What if we went back through all the family trees and just pulled those people out that were products of rape and incest? Would there be any population of the world left if we did that?”
King’s questions were startlingly direct in their implication that sexual violence, at least if it led to childbirth, was a good thing. His frank misogyny almost overshadowed another implication of his words: When King refers to world population, he’s not talking about everybody.
King is only the most notorious of the politicians who have recently justified their opposition to abortion by linking it to their anti-immigration politics. Conservative lawmakers and right-wing vigilantes alike have adopted a seemingly new language for describing their antiabortion stance: the white nationalist discourse of the “great replacement,” a conspiracy theory that holds that nonwhite immigrants are demographically “replacing” whites throughout the West.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
what passes as journalism today
To save black babies from abortion.
You said it!!
Apparently, MS. Brostoff doesn’t get basic math. She would do well to live in Malmo Sweden for a few months to see how she likes her “multiculturalism”.
YEs, because Sanger was so pro blacks and Mengele was so against abortion...
Not true. He was only making an argument against abortion in the case of rape. It’s not the child’s fault who the father is - and throughout most of history abortions were not a medical option. So it only logically follows that most of us have a rape in our family lineage at some point. If every rape resulting in pregnancy had ended in abortion over the past few hundred generations, it’s likely most of us would not be here.
And anyone still believes that the press has any sense of SHAME for their KNOWING dishonesty??
(NOT me.)
Yours, TMN78247
And anyone still believes that the press has any sense of SHAME for their KNOWING dishonesty??
(NOT me.)
Yours, TMN78247
Consider that JFK beside today holding beliefs that would have him labeled a radical conservative/reactionary
Kennedy would also be labeled a ‘white far-right nationalist’ by these mainstream neo-commies
The writer of this piece imputes motives to Steve King that are not there.
Ignore. Sane America pays no attention to this nonsense.
No one, not even a libtard claiming it, actually believes that white nationalists are a serious threat.
They just have nowhere else to go after the Russian hoax collapsed in utter humiliation. They could try coming up with policies that make sense, but that’s just too out there.
Went to her twitter feed.
At least she admits she is a left wing hack. Oozing on about her experience writing for and being edited by the WaPoo.
BARF!
How Communists, terrorists, and antisemites took over the Democrat Party.
Millions of people have Genghis Khan’s DNA.
Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became known as Planned Parenthood, in 1921. Sanger was a well-known eugenicist. Eugenics is a social movement and a belief that through selective breeding and sterilization you can improve the genetic features of the population. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble in 1939, Sanger wrote:
“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Extermination of “the Negro population” is exactly what Sanger wanted to do. Sanger was born in NY shortly after the Civil War in 1879. She died in Arizona in 1966. She grew up in a culture where there were separate drinking fountains for colored people and white people; where colored people were regulated to the back of the bus and she lived through the infamous Race Wars of the Northern Migration of colored people in the 40’s, 50’s, and 60’s. She was the offspring of a Civil War veteran. Her father was more of a liberal/socialist due to his own actions of supporting Women’s Suffrage, support of free educastion and political influence. Her political involvement in NY is rife with Socialist organizations such as the Women’s Committee of the New York Socialist party.
While politics of today is different of that in 20’s, it is easy to fall into the trap that the values were the same. However, Socialism as a name was gaining traction leading up to the first World War and Facism leading up to the Second World war. McCarthyism was more about being a Socialist than a Communist although it is the latter in which McCarthyism is better known for. Being called a Socialist during the era of McCarthyism is akin to being called a Racist today. It is easy to fall into the trap, using the context of today’s values, to think the values of yesteryear is the same as today.
Sanger was a Socialist through and through. Her “community organization” was to destroy the larger family and thus the population of the world by selecting which traits and genes to promulgate in offspring. It was her work founding the American Birth Control League, later becoming Planned Parenthood, in 1921 to make women aware of birth control rather than to take care of it should the woman ever got pregnant unintentionally. She was not for abortion at all. However, was for blacks not having children and saw that it was birth control versus abortion to cull the population of colored people and keep the population numbers down.
Sanger was quoted later as saying “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Denoting her stance on abortion, to which she had seen women die from self-induced abortions, had changed by the time she the Birth Control organization transformed into Planned Parenthood.
“...“If we continue to abort our babies and import a replacement for them in the form of young violent men, we are supplanting our culture, our civilization,” King said...”
He’s NOT wrong.
“What if we went back through all the family trees and just pulled those people out that were products of rape and incest? Would there be any population of the world left if we did that?”
From working on genealogy for decades, a significant number of us wouldn’t be here today if it weren’t for illegitimate births over the last couple of hundred years.
Tagging patriotic Americans with the “white nationalist” label is their way to try to isolate and marginalize those who think like we do. Many of us are white. Many of us believe in putting the USA first. So there you go: white nationalist. In essence they’re hating on white people for patriotism. We need to be throwing back labels at them, like “American-hating globalist,” etc. It’s all about scaring the weak-minded voters in the squishy middle.
True! And that's one reason eastern European/Ukrainian are so beautiful -- he killed all the ugly ones. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.