Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

The 1400s to 1500s were not “ancient times.” That was the Middle Ages.


7 posted on 08/27/2019 10:55:28 AM PDT by Avalon Memories (This Deplorable is not fooled by the Marxist-Stalinist totalitarians infesting the Dem Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Avalon Memories

More like the the Renaissance which spanned the 14th and 17th centuries. The Middle Ages lasted from the 5th to the 15th century. So there was a bit of overlap in how scholars label these eras.

Except there was no “Renaissance” in South America.


9 posted on 08/27/2019 11:19:27 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Avalon Memories

Well, ‘Middle Ages’ in Europe.

Different empires, different timelines; those years would have been the Ming Dynasty in China, very late in their history

But it seems to be what would be the equivalent of the early Roman empire in it’s development, even though 1500 years later.

A very interesting article. We should be thankful that the Incas and Aztecs remained pre-technological!


12 posted on 08/27/2019 11:38:15 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (We had entirely enough government in 1789.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Avalon Memories

Actually that was the start of the Rennaisance in Europe.


18 posted on 08/27/2019 2:36:17 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Coming in from the cold .... been a LONG while.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson